Artur v. Rokosky et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Petitioner Gabeev Artur has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1). The Honorable Deborah M. Fine, United States Magistrate
Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 12), recommending that the
Court deny the Petition. Judge Fine advised the parties that they had fourteen (14) days to
file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a
waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. (Doc. Doc. 12 at 6) (citing 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th
Cir. 2003)).
The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to
review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is
not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must
determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly
objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken.
Gabeev Artur,
Petitioner,
vs.
Eric Rokosky, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-26-01361-PHX-SPL
ORDER
Case 2:26-cv-01361-SPL Document 13 Filed 06/25/26 Page 1 of 2

2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court will adopt the R&R and deny the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating
that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge
may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or
return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. That Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 12) is accepted and adopted by the Court;
2. That the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(Doc. 1) is denied; and
3. That the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.
Dated this 25th day of June, 2026.
Honorable Steven P. Logan
United States District Judge
Case 2:26-cv-01361-SPL Document 13 Filed 06/25/26 Page 2 of 2