2:25-cv-04443•Benner v. Trans Union LLC et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Carl A Benner, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Trans Union LLC, et al., Defendants. No. CV-25-04443-PHX-JAT ORDER On March 23, 2026, the Plaintiff Carl A. Benner and Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) filed a Joint Discovery Dispute Motion (Doc. 41). After the Court denied Citibank’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (Doc. 23; Doc. 44), the Court ordered Plaintiff and Citibank to file a supplemental brief indicating whether the discovery dispute was moot, and if not, clarifying the scope of discovery. (Doc. 45). Citibank subsequently appealed this Court’s Order denying Citibank’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. (Doc. 47). On April 13, 2026, the Plaintiff and Citibank filed a Joint Supplement Brief regarding the discovery dispute motion. (Doc. 48). The parties agree that the discovery dispute has not been resolved. (Doc. 48 at 2). However, the Plaintiff and Citibank also agree that because Citibank appealed the denial of its motion to compel arbitration, discovery as to Citibank is automatically stayed pursuant to Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 599 U.S. 736 (2023). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Discovery Dispute Motion (Doc. 41) is denied Case 2:25-cv-04443-JAT Document 49 Filed 04/13/26 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery as to Citibank (only) is stayed pending the resolution of the interlocutory appeal. Dated this 13th day of April, 2026. Case 2:25-cv-04443-JAT Document 49 Filed 04/13/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.