Cramer #124771 v. Arizona, State of et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
David Cramer,
Plaintiff,
v.
State of Arizona, et al.,
Defendants.
No. CV-25-04258-PHX-JAT
ORDER
On December 3, 2025, this Court struck the first filing in this case finding it was not
a “complaint” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 3. (Doc. 5). Because there was no
qualifying complaint, this “case” should never have been opened; therefore, it was closed.
(Id.).
On January 23, 2026, Plaintiff David Cramer1 filed a motion to reopen this case
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). (Doc. 6). This Court denied that motion at
Doc. 9.
On February 11, 2026, Plaintiff filed another motion to reopen this case that appears
to be identical to the one previously filed at Doc. 6. (Doc. 10).
For the reasons stated in the dismissal order (Doc. 5) and the order denying the
motion to reopen (Doc. 9),
/ / /
1 As noted in the Order at Doc. 5, originally this case was filed by a non-attorney claiming
to be an “attorney in fact.”
Case 2:25-cv-04258-JAT--ASB Document 12 Filed 03/23/26 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS ORDERED that the second motion to reopen (Doc. 10) is denied.
Dated this 20th day of March, 2026.
Case 2:25-cv-04258-JAT--ASB Document 12 Filed 03/23/26 Page 2 of 2