Ross v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

6:25-cv-06117ArwdApr 17, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
FRED EDWARD ROSS 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	CIVIL NO. 6:25-cv-06117-MEF
FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner
Social Security Administration 	DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
For reasons stated in a memorandum opinion dated April 17, 2026, we conclude that the
decision of the Commissioner denying benefits to the Plaintiff is not supported by substantial
evidence and should be reversed and remanded for further consideration pursuant to sentence four
of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties have sixty days from entry of the judgment on the docket
in which to appeal.
If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney’s fees and cost under the Equal Access
to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up until 30 days after the
judgment becomes “not appealable” i.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for appeal has ended. See
Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G).
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 17th day of April 2026.
/s/ Mark E. Ford
HON. MARK E. FORD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 6:25-cv-06117-MEF Document 13 Filed 04/17/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.