Richard v. Hot Springs City Police Dept et al

6:24-cv-06159ArwdMay 6, 2025

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER W. RICHARD 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 6:24-cv-06159
HOT SPRINGS CITY POLICE
DEPT; MICHAEL JEFFREY; and
LIEUTENANT SHAWN STAPLETON 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed January 14, 2025, by the
Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(ECF No. 7). 	Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed
without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s Order to file an Amended Complaint.
Plaintiff has not responded to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has
passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record
and that Judge Bryant’s reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation
(ECF No. 7) in toto. 	Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1).
should be and hereby is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of May, 2025.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
Chief United States District Judge
Case 6:24-cv-06159-SOH Document 8 Filed 05/06/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.