6:24-cv-06093•Dixon et al v. USDA Rural Development et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION BRITTANY DIXON and KELTON DIXON PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 6:24-cv-6093 USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT; GRAY REI, LLC; and 117 HOT SPRINGS DR., ARKADELPHIA CLARK COUNTY, ARKANSAS, in rem DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 21. Judge Bryant recommends that the Court grant the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) filed by Separate Defendant USDA Rural Development because it is entitled to sovereign immunity. Further, Judge Bryant recommends that the Court deny without prejudice the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5) filed by Separate Defendant Gray REI, LLC and remand the remaining state law claims against Gray REI, LLC back to the Circuit Court of Clark County, Arkansas. Separate Defendant Gray REI, LLC has filed an objection, arguing that because the Court is declining supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims, the Court should abstain from ruling on Gray REI, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss and remand this matter to state court for further proceedings, included but not limited to a ruling on Gray REI, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8).1 The Court agrees with Gray REI, LLC and finds that the Court should decline to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and abstain from ruling on REI LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8). 1This case was removed to this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442, which provides for the removal of a civil action commenced in state court against an agency of the United States or its officers. If the Court dismisses USDA Rural Development, this case will only involve state law claims between non-diverse parties. Case 6:24-cv-06093-SOH Document 23 Filed 03/27/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 Upon review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) in part. The Court finds that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) filed by USDA Rural Development should be and hereby is GRANTED. USDA Rural Development is DISMISSED from this case. The Court abstains from ruling on REI LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8). Because the Court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction, the Court will decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Thus, the Court instructs the Clerk of Court to immediately REMAND this matter to the Circuit Court of Clark County, Arkansas, for further disposition. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 27th day of March, 2025. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge Case 6:24-cv-06093-SOH Document 23 Filed 03/27/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.