Stovall v. Brotherton

6:23-cv-06115ArwdMar 26, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
VANDY STOVALL 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 6:23-cv-6115
JASON A. BROTHERTON 	DEFENDANT
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by the Honorable Mark
E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 47. Judge
Ford recommends that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 39) be denied. No
party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Ford’s
reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the R&R (ECF No. 47) in toto. Accordingly. Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 39) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 26th day of March, 2026.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Case 6:23-cv-06115-SOH-MEF Document 53 Filed 03/26/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.