London Luxury LLC v. Walmart Inc.

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
LONDON LUXURY, LLC 	PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT
V. 	CASE NO. 5:22-CV-5059
WALMART, INC. 	DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF
ORDER NUMBER SIX REGARDING WALMART’S PRIVILEGE LOG
On Sunday, March 24, 2024, Walmart’s attorney emailed the Court and opposing
counsel to advise about the status of Walmart’s compliance with the Court’s recent Orders
and directives regarding the disclosure of documents redacted for privilege. See Docs.
398, 405, 408, 413, 414, 418. Walmart then produced to the Court, ex parte, two sets of
Bates-numbered documents, one labeled “Exhibit E” and the other “Exhibit F.” These
exhibits correspond to lists of Bates-numbered documents identified by London Luxury in
an email to the Court the previous day, Saturday, March 23.1
Today the Court reviewed all Bates-stamped documents identified in Walmart’s
Exhibit F. Below is a chart indicating the Court’s rulings as to privilege for these
documents. A “sustained” ruling indicates that the Court agrees with Walmart that the
document has been properly withheld as privileged, per the Court’s prior Orders. An
“overruled” ruling indicates that the Court finds the documents are not privileged and must
immediately be produced to London Luxury without redactions.
1 Walmart’s email of March 24 and London Luxury’s email of March 23 are attached to
this Order as exhibits.
Case 5:22-cv-05059-TLB Document 429 Filed 03/25/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
Bates Stamp 	Duplicates 	Ruling
87919 	SUSTAINED
87920 	SUSTAINED
87922 	88316 	SUSTAINED
87981 	87984–87985, 94363–
94364
SUSTAINED
88178 	SUSTAINED
88180 	SUSTAINED
88194 	SUSTAINED
88202 	SUSTAINED
88407 	SUSTAINED
88409 	SUSTAINED
88411 	88186, 88200, 88203,
88413, 88417, 88423,
98332
SUSTAINED
88422 	SUSTAINED
88988 	SUSTAINED
89420 	SUSTAINED
94365 	SUSTAINED
94515 	SUSTAINED
95087 	SUSTAINED
95124 	OVERRULED
98343 	SUSTAINED
98345 	SUSTAINED
101853–101859 	OVERRULED
101860–101864 	OVERRULED
87925–87926 	94354–94355, 94512–
94513, 94520–94521,
95122–95123
OVERRULED, but the
redacted portion was
disclosed previously.
See Doc. 399, p. 10
n.2.
88018–88019 	SUSTAINED
88181–88182 	SUSTAINED
88183–88184 	SUSTAINED
Case 5:22-cv-05059-TLB Document 429 Filed 03/25/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>

3
88187–88188 	SUSTAINED
88235–88238 	SUSTAINED
88270–88272 	SUSTAINED
88287–88293 	OVERRULED
88297–88308 	OVERRULED
88317–88323 	SUSTAINED
89011–89016 	SUSTAINED
89019–89024 	SUSTAINED
94341–94343 	OVERRULED
94408–94409 	SUSTAINED
94880–94890 	OVERRULED
94893–94902 	OVERRULED
95060–95064 	OVERRULED
95183–95185 	SUSTAINED
95189–95194 	SUSTAINED
95219–95220 	SUSTAINED
95291–95300 	OVERRULED
96835–96836 	OVERRULED
97668–97669 	OVERRULED
98333–98341 	SUSTAINED
98346–98348 	SUSTAINED
98349–98355 	SUSTAINED
IT IS SO ORDERED on this 25th day of March, 2024.
/s/ Timothy L. Brooks_____________
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:22-cv-05059-TLB Document 429 Filed 03/25/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>