5:19-cr-50115•USA v. Wenger
Full text
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES PLAINTIFF V. Criminal No. 5:19-CR-50115-001 AUSTIN WENGER DEFENDANT MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On December 29, 2025, Austin Wenger (Thompson) filed a pro se Motion to be Transferred to Federal Custody (ECF No. 35). The Government responded to the Motion on January 30, 2026. (ECF No. 38). Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3), this matter was referred to the undersigned for the purposes of making a report and recommendation. (ECF No. 81). For the reasons explained below, it is recommended that Wenger’s Motion be DENIED. On November 20, 2019, Wenger was named in a one count Indictment in the Fayetteville Division of U.S. District Court, charging him with one count of felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). (ECF No. 1). On November 21, 2019, U.S. Magistrate Judge Erin Wiedemann granted the Government’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Prosequendum (ECF Nos. 5, 6) and the Writ directed the Arkansas Department of Corrections to produce Wenger for his arraignment in federal court. It appears undisputed from the Final Presentence Investigation Report (ECF No. 23) and from records of the Washington County Circuit Court, that Wenger was in state custody at that time as he had been arrested on September Case 5:19-cr-50115-TLB Document 39 Filed 02/17/26 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: <pageID>
2 6, 2019, resulting in the State’s prosecution of Wenger for multiple felonies in 72CR19-2365 and 72CR19-2632.1 Wenger was arrested on the federal gun charge, appeared for arraignment with private counsel, and was detained on the writ. (ECF Nos. 7, 10-11). On February 3, 2020, Wenger pled guilty (ECF Nos. 16, 17) and was sentenced by Chief Judge Timothy L. Brooks on May 8, 2020. (ECF No. 30). The Judgment reflects Wenger received the following sentence of imprisonment: Two hundred sixty-two (262) months, to run concurrently with any undischarged term of imprisonment in Washington County, Arkansas, Circuit Court, Docket Numbers CR19-2632 and CR19-2365, pursuant to USSG § 5G1.3(c), with credit for time served in state and federal custody since September 6, 2019. (ECF No. 33). Approximately one month later and on June 3, 2021, Wenger was sentenced by Circuit Judge Mark Lindsay to 240 months in the Arkansas Department of Corrections upon pleading guilty to attempted capital murder, kidnapping, a terroristic act, discharging a weapon from a vehicle and illegal possession of a firearm in Washington County Circuit Court cases CR19-2632 and CR19-2365. (ECF No. 38-1). Wenger’s state court Sentencing Orders provide that the state court sentence of 240 months would run concurrent to Wenger’s federal sentence, and Wenger was to receive 539 days of jail time credit. The Government contends that Wenger’s motion to be transferred to federal custody is misplaced because Wenger never left primary state custody; rather, he appeared on a writ from state custody and was returned to state custody following his federal sentencing. The Government correctly points out that transferring an individual from state to federal custody via a writ does not ordinarily relinquish primary custody which was vested in the State of Arkansas, citing United 1 https://caseinfo.arcourts.gov/opad/case/72CR-19-2632 (February 16, 2026). https://caseinfo.arcourts.gov/opad/case/72CR-19-2365 (February 16, 2026). Case 5:19-cr-50115-TLB Document 39 Filed 02/17/26 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: <pageID>
3 States v. Cole, 416 F.3d 894 (8th Cir. 2005); Wiseman v. Wachendorf, 984 F.3d 649, 654 (8th Cir. 2021). As explained in Wiseman, under the “doctrine of primary jurisdiction,” a prisoner serving a term in state custody generally begins to serve a federal sentence when the United States assumes primary jurisdiction over the prisoner and the prisoner is presented to serve his federal sentence. Wiseman, 984 F.3d at 654, quoting Elwell v. Fisher, 716 F.3d 477, 481 (8th Cir. 2013); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3585(a). A federal sentence does not commence, however, “when the United States merely takes physical custody of a prisoner who is subject to another sovereign's primary jurisdiction.” Elwell, 716 F.3d at 481. The first sovereign to establish physical custody over a criminal defendant retains primary jurisdiction until it releases jurisdiction. Id. And not every change in custody constitutes a release of primary jurisdiction. For example, when a State with primary jurisdiction transfers a prisoner to the United States pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, the prisoner is considered merely “on loan” from the State. Id. at 481-82. Here, the record is undisputed that Wenger appeared in federal court on a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum and there is no evidence that State of Arkansas relinquished its primary jurisdiction over him. See Johnson v. Gill, 883 F.3d 756, 765 (9th Cir. 2018) (“Generally, a sovereign can only relinquish primary jurisdiction in one of four ways: 1) release on bail; 2) dismissal of charges; 3) parole; or 4) expiration of sentence.” Elwell, 716 F.3d at 481 (citation and quotation omitted)). Because Wenger has not satisfied his state court sentence of imprisonment, he is not entitled to transfer to federal custody. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Wenger’s Motion to be Transferred to Federal Custody (ECF No. 35) be DENIED. Case 5:19-cr-50115-TLB Document 39 Filed 02/17/26 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: <pageID>
4 The parties have fourteen days from receipt of our report and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of facts. The parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court. RECOMMENDED this 17th day of February 2026. __________________________________________ CHRISTY COMSTOCK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 5:19-cr-50115-TLB Document 39 Filed 02/17/26 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.