4:25-cv-04061•Pawn Express of Texarkana, Inc. et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Pawn Express of Texarkana, Inc. et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
4:25-cv-04061ArwdApr 22, 2026
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION PAWN EXPRESS OF TEXARKANA, INC. and BROOKE’S REAL ESTATE LLC PLAINTIFFS v. Case No. 4:25-cv-4061 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON, Subscribing to Policy Number FINFR2205957 DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. ECF No. 18. An action may be dismissed by “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). “Caselaw concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.” Gardiner v. A.H. Robins Co., 747 F.2d 1180, 1189 (8th Cir. 1984). The instant stipulation of dismissal is signed by Plaintiffs and Defendant. Thus, the claims in this matter were effectively dismissed when the parties filed the instant stipulation. However, this order issues for purposes of maintaining the docket. Accordingly, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear their own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 22nd day of April, 2026. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge Case 4:25-cv-04061-SOH Document 19 Filed 04/22/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.