Fifer v. Ghormely et al

4:23-cv-04088ArwdMar 19, 2025

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
CLINTON DARAL FIFER 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 4:23-cv-4088
LIEUTENANT KAREN GHORMELY, et al. 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by the Honorable
Christy D. Comstock, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF
No. 37. Judge Comstock recommends that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
31) be granted and that Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed with prejudice. 	Plaintiff filed a timely
objection, but it offers nothing resembling an argument against Judge Comstock’s analysis. ECF
No. 38.
Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Comstock’s
reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the R&R (ECF No. 37) in toto. 	Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 31) is hereby GRANTED. 	Plaintiff’s claims are hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 19th day of March, 2025.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
Chief United States District Judge
Case 4:23-cv-04088-SOH Document 39 Filed 03/19/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.