Yoram Razz v. State of Israel, et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
YORAM RAZZ 	PLAINTIFF
V. 	Civil No. 2:24-cv-02114-TLB
STATE OF ISRAEL, et al. 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Rule 11(b)(1) Motion to Sanction Attorney Brett Taylor for
Falsely Certifying Service of Motion filed November 15, 2024. (ECF No. 37). A Response to the
Motion was filed the same date. (ECF No. 38). Also before the Court is the Separate Defendant
Aldi Inc.’s Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of its Pending Motion to Dismiss filed on
November 15, 2024. (ECF No. 39). These matters were referred to the undersigned on November
16, 2024. (ECF No. 40).
Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanction (ECF No. 37) is DENIED, as it appears from the pleadings
that Separate Defendant Perry’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26) was mailed to Plaintiff’s address
of record, and that a copy was also sent to the e-mail address Plaintiff provided to the Court.
Separate Defendant Perry’s request for an award of attorney’s fees in connection with responding
to the Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. Based on the e-mail thread attached to both Plaintiff’s
Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 37-1) and Defendant Perry’s Response thereto (ECF No. 38-2),
however, 	there 	is 	a 	question 	concerning 	the 	Plaintiff’s 	correct 	e-mail 	address:
RazzScientificSoftware@outlook.com, as reflected in Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1 at 29) and
other pleadings, or razscientificsoftware@hotmail.com, as reflect in the exhibits to the pending
Motion for Sanctions and Response. Accordingly, the Plaintiff is DIRECTED to notify the Clerk
Case 2:24-cv-02114-TLB Document 44 Filed 11/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
of Court, no later than Monday, November 25, 2024, of the e-mail address he wishes to use in this
litigation.
Separate Defendant Aldi Inc.’s Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of its Pending
Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 39) is GRANTED. 	Separate Defendant Aldi Inc. is given until
Monday, November 25, 2024, to file its Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of November 2024.
/s/	
Mark E. Ford
HONORABLE MARK E. FORD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 2:24-cv-02114-TLB Document 44 Filed 11/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>