Dykes v. Henry et al

2:24-cv-02058ArwdNov 7, 2024

Full text

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
JEREMY LANE DYKES, SR. 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Civil No. 2:24-cv-02058-TLB-MEF
OFFICER DUTTON, et. al. 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
This is a civil rights action filed by the Plaintiff pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff
proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. Currently before the Court is the filing of Plaintiff’s second
Supplement to his Complaint. (ECF No. 15).
The Clerk is DIRECTED to STRIKE Plaintiff’s Second Supplement. 	(ECF No. 15).
Plaintiff is advised that he may not randomly supplement and add facts or claims to his Complaint
at any time throughout the case. Instead, his claims and the factual allegations supporting them
must be contained in a single Complaint. If Plaintiff believes he needs to amend his Complaint,
he is free to do so by filing a Motion to Amend his Complaint. This motion must be submitted in
compliance with Local Rule 5.5(e), or the motion will be denied. 	Any proposed amended
complaint attached to such a motion must be submitted on the court-approved prisoner complaint
form for this District. 	The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff another copy of the Prisoner
Litigation Guide for Plaintiff’s review.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of November 2024.
/s/
Mark E. Ford
HON. MARK E. FORD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 2:24-cv-02058-TLB Document 16 Filed 11/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.