USA v. Hughes, et al

2:20-cr-20008ArwdJun 27, 2024

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 	PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT
v. 	No. 2:20-cr-20008-2
BRENT PRESLEY 	DEFENDANT/MOVANT
ORDER
The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 83) from Chief United States
Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford, recommending that Defendant Brent Presley’s motion (Doc. 78)
to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be denied and dismissed without prejudice because it is facially
deficient. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the deadline for
objecting 	has 	passed. 	After 	careful 	review, 	the 	Court 	concludes 	that 	the 	report 	and
recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Brent Presley’s motion (Doc. 78) to vacate
under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. No certificate of appealability shall issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of June, 2024.
/s/P. K. Holmes ,
ΙΙΙ
P.K. HOLMES, III
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:20-cr-20008-PKH Document 85 Filed 06/27/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.