2:20-cr-20008•USA v. Hughes, et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT v. No. 2:20-cr-20008-2 BRENT PRESLEY DEFENDANT/MOVANT ORDER The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 83) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford, recommending that Defendant Brent Presley’s motion (Doc. 78) to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be denied and dismissed without prejudice because it is facially deficient. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the deadline for objecting has passed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the report and recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Brent Presley’s motion (Doc. 78) to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. No certificate of appealability shall issue. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of June, 2024. /s/P. K. Holmes , ΙΙΙ P.K. HOLMES, III U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:20-cr-20008-PKH Document 85 Filed 06/27/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.