USA v. Nguyen et al

AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF
v. CASE NO. 03CR20039-002
HONG T. PHAN DEFENDANT
O R D E R
Currently before the Court is a motion by Defendant to
terminate her term of supervised release (doc. 228). Defendant
indicates that she has made timely payments on her fine. The
Government objects to Defendant’s motion as she was convicted of
a serious drug offense and has not stated a sufficient reason for
early termination of his supervised release. (Doc. 230).
The Court finds that the benefits of supervised release to
Defendant outweigh any burden upon her. After considering the
factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553, the Court cannot find that
termination of her supervised release is warranted. See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3583(e)(1). Accordingly, Defendant’s motion (doc. 228) is
hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of January 2013.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
HONORABLE ROBERT T. DAWSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:03-cr-20039-TLB Document 233 Filed 01/30/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>