1:23-cr-10008•USA v. Johnson, et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 1:23-cr-10008-001 WILLIS DEVON JOHNSON DEFENDANT ORDER OF DETENTION After conducting a detention hearing (ECF No. 32) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail Reform Act, the Court orders the above-named defendant detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (i). A. Statement of Reasons for the Detention The Court orders the defendant’s detention because it finds: ☒ By a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required. ☒ By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community. B. Findings of Fact The Court’s announced findings at the dentition hearing are included herein by reference. The Court’s findings are based on the evidence and information presented in Court and which was contained in the Pretrial Services Report, including the following: ☒ (1) Nature and Circumstances of the offense charged: ☐ (a) The crime, felon in possession of a firearm ☐ (b) The offense is a crime of violence. ☒ (c) The offense involves a narcotic drug. ☒ (d) The offense involves a large amount of controlled substances. ☐ (e) Other facts: Click to enter text ☒ (2) The weight of the evidence against the defendant is substantial. ☒ (3) The history and characteristics of the defendant including: (a) General Factors: ☐ The defendant appears to have a mental condition which may affect whether the defendant will appear. ☐ The defendant has no known family ties in the area. ☒ The defendant has no known steady employment. ☒ The defendant has no known substantial financial resources. ☐ The defendant is not a long-time resident of the community. ☐ The defendant does not have any known significant community ties. ☒ Past conduct of the defendant: Case 1:23-cr-10008-SOH Document 35 Filed 01/24/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: <pageID>
☒ The defendant has a history relating to drug abuse. ☐ The defendant has a history relating to alcohol abuse. ☒ The defendant has a significant prior criminal record, including: Defendant has at least 5 prior felony convictions, including 4 prior convictions related to controlled substance offenses. He has at least 2 other pending controlled substance cases pending in state court. ☒ The defendant has a prior record of failure to appear at court proceedings. ☒ The defendant has a history of violating probation and/or parole, including: Defendant has violated conditions of bond, parole or probation on multiple occasions. (b) Whether the defendant was on probation, parole, or release by a court; At the time of the current arrest, the defendant was on: ☐ Probation ☒ Parole ☒ Release pending trail, sentence, appeal or completion of sentence. (c) Other Factors: ☐ The defendant is an illegal alien and is subject to deportation. ☐ The defendant is an illegal alien and is subject to deportation. ☒ Other: Defendant has committed numerous crimes while on release status either pretrial or probation/parole. (4) The nature and seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant’s release are as follows: Defendant has a history of failure to appear. He has absconded from supervision on several occasions. He has a history of committing crimes while subject to court supervision. Distribution of more than 500 grams of methamphetamine is dangerous to the community at large. (5) Rebuttable Presumptions In determining that the defendant should be detained, the court also relied on the following rebuttable presumption(s) contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), which the court finds the defendant has not rebutted: ☒ a. The crime charged is one described in § 3142(f)(1). ☐ (A) a crime of violence; or ☐ (B) an offense for which the maximum penalty is life imprisonment or death; or ☒ (C) a controlled substance violation that has a maximum penalty of ten years or more; or ☐ (D) A felony after the defendant had been convicted of two or more prior offenses described in (A) through (C) above, and the defendant has a prior conviction of one of the crimes mentioned in (A) through (C) above which is less than five years old and which was committed while the defendant was on pretrial release. ☒ b. There is probable cause to believe that defendant committed an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed ☒ in the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801, et seq., ☐ the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 951, et seq., ☐ the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, 46 U.S.C. App. §§ 1901, et seq., or ☐ an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332b. ☐ an offense involving a minor under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, Case 1:23-cr-10008-SOH Document 35 Filed 01/24/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: <pageID>
2244(a)(1), 2245, 2251, 2251A, 2252(a)(1), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(1), 2252A(a)(2), 2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4), 2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425. C. Additional Directives Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4), the Court directs that: The defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal; The defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel; and That, on order of a court of the United States, or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 24th day of January 2024. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 1:23-cr-10008-SOH Document 35 Filed 01/24/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.