USA v. Johnson, et al

1:23-cr-10008ArwdJan 24, 2024

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 1:23-cr-10008-001
WILLIS DEVON JOHNSON 	DEFENDANT
ORDER OF DETENTION
After conducting a detention hearing (ECF No. 32) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail
Reform Act, the Court orders the above-named defendant detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and
(i).
A. 	Statement of Reasons for the Detention
The Court orders the defendant’s detention because it finds:
☒ 	By a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will
reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required.
☒ 	By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will
reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community.
B. 	Findings of Fact
The Court’s announced findings at the dentition hearing are included herein by reference. The
Court’s findings are based on the evidence and information presented in Court and which was
contained in the Pretrial Services Report, including the following:
☒ 	(1) 	Nature and Circumstances of the offense charged:
☐ 	(a) The crime, felon in possession of a firearm
☐ 	(b) The offense is a crime of violence.
☒ 	(c) The offense involves a narcotic drug.
☒ 	(d) The offense involves a large amount of controlled substances.
☐ 	(e) Other facts: 	Click to enter text
☒ 	(2) 	The weight of the evidence against the defendant is substantial.
☒ 	(3) 	The history and characteristics of the defendant including:
(a) General Factors:
☐ 	The defendant appears to have a mental condition which may affect whether the
defendant will appear.
☐ 	The defendant has no known family ties in the area.
☒ 	The defendant has no known steady employment.
☒ 	The defendant has no known substantial financial resources.
☐ 	The defendant is not a long-time resident of the community.
☐ 	The defendant does not have any known significant community ties.
☒ 	Past conduct of the defendant:
Case 1:23-cr-10008-SOH Document 35 Filed 01/24/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>
☒ 	The defendant has a history relating to drug abuse.
☐ 	The defendant has a history relating to alcohol abuse.
☒ 	The defendant has a significant prior criminal record, including: Defendant
has at least 5 prior felony convictions, including 4 prior convictions related
to controlled substance offenses. He has at least 2 other pending controlled
substance cases pending in state court.
☒ 	The defendant has a prior record of failure to appear at court proceedings.
☒ 	The defendant has a history of violating probation and/or parole, including:
Defendant has violated conditions of bond, parole or probation on multiple
occasions.
(b) Whether the defendant was on probation, parole, or release by a court;
At the time of the current arrest, the defendant was on:
☐ 	Probation
☒ 	Parole
☒ 	Release pending trail, sentence, appeal or completion of sentence.
(c) Other Factors:
☐ 	The defendant is an illegal alien and is subject to deportation.
☐ 	The defendant is an illegal alien and is subject to deportation.
☒ Other: Defendant has committed numerous crimes while on release status
either pretrial or probation/parole.
(4) 	The nature and seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant’s release are as
follows:
Defendant has a history of failure to appear. He has absconded from supervision on
several occasions. 	He has a history of committing crimes while subject to court
supervision. Distribution of more than 500 grams of methamphetamine is dangerous
to the community at large.
(5) 	Rebuttable Presumptions
In determining that the defendant should be detained, the court also relied on the
following rebuttable presumption(s) contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), which the court
finds the defendant has not rebutted:
☒ 	a. The crime charged is one described in § 3142(f)(1).
☐ 	(A) a crime of violence; or
☐ (B) an offense for which the maximum penalty is life imprisonment or
death; or
☒ (C) a controlled substance violation that has a maximum penalty of ten
years or more; or
☐ 	(D) A felony after the defendant had been convicted of two or more prior
offenses described in (A) through (C) above, and the defendant has a prior
conviction of one of the crimes mentioned in (A) through (C) above which
is less than five years old and which was committed while the defendant
was on pretrial release.
☒ 	b. There is probable cause to believe that defendant committed an offense for
which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed
☒ 	in the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801, et seq.,
☐ 	the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 951, et seq.,
☐ 	the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, 46 U.S.C. App. §§ 1901, et seq.,
or
☐ 	an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332b.
☐ 	an offense involving a minor under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242,
Case 1:23-cr-10008-SOH Document 35 Filed 01/24/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>
2244(a)(1), 	2245, 	2251, 	2251A, 	2252(a)(1), 	2252(a)(2), 	2252(a)(3),
2252A(a)(1), 2252A(a)(2), 2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4), 2260, 2421, 2422,
2423, or 2425.
C. 	Additional Directives
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4), the Court directs that:
The defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a
corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences
or being held in custody pending appeal;
The defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel; and
That, on order of a court of the United States, or on request of an attorney for the Government, the
person in charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant
to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 24th day of January 2024.
/s/ Barry A. Bryant
HON. BARRY A. BRYANT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 1:23-cr-10008-SOH Document 35 Filed 01/24/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.