Pugh v. Choctaw County, Alabama

1:25-cv-00296AlsdJul 21, 2025

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DEVIN BRANDIS PUGH, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	CASE NO. 2:25-cv-00026-RAH-KFP
)
CHOCTAW COUNTY, ALABAMA, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
ORDER
This case is before the Court on a Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered
on June 26, 2025. (Doc. 19.) In the Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends
that this case be dismissed without prejudice because it appears there is no factual basis for
proper venue or convenience of the witnesses and parties in the Middle District of
Alabama. In other words, the case should be filed in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Alabama since it appears that most or all of the records and
witnesses relevant to the underlying claims are likely to be located in Choctaw County,
Alabama (i.e., the Southern District of Alabama).
On July 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed a one-sentence Motion to Object (doc. 24), which
the Court will construe as an objection, in which he objects to the dismissal of this case.
His response however suggests that he does not oppose transfer of this case to the proper
venue proper. 	Other than this statement, Plaintiff provides no argument, discussion or
explanation as to why the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is in error.
Case 1:25-cv-00296-TFM-MU Doc# 25 Filed 07/21/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID#
<pageID>
After an independent and de novo review of the file, and for good cause, the Court
will adopt the Recommendation but, instead of dismissing the case, will order that the case
be transferred to the Southern District of Alabama. 	Accordingly, it is ORDERED as
follows:
(1) 	Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel (doc. 21) is DENIED;
(2) 	Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel and Motion for Relief from Obligation
to Prepay Fees (doc. 22) is DENIED;
(3) 	Plaintiff’s Motion of Obligation to Prepay Fees (doc. 23) is DENIED;
(4) 	Plaintiff’s 	Motion 	to 	Object 	to 	the 	Recommendation 	(doc. 	24) 	is
OVERRULED and DENIED;
(5) 	The Recommendation is ADOPTED but modified to reflect that the case
will be transferred to the Southern District of Alabama instead of dismissed;
(6) 	This case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Alabama; and
(7) 	The Clerk of Court shall undertake all actions necessary to effectuate the
transfer.
DONE, on this the 21st day of July 2025.
R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:25-cv-00296-TFM-MU Doc# 25 Filed 07/21/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID#
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.