Riley v. Taylor et al

1:25-cv-00193AlsdJun 12, 2025

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
THERON RILEY, JR., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:25-00193-KD-B
)
RAYMOND TAYLOR, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues
raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection
is made, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
and dated May 13, 2025, (Doc. 5), is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED
that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as malicious for abuse of the judicial process
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1) because Plaintiff affirmatively
misrepresented his litigation history to the Court.
DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of June 2025.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:25-cv-00193-KD-B Doc# 7 Filed 06/12/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID#
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.