Nelson Boatyard, Inc. v. Vessel Salamati et al

1:24-cv-00349AlsdApr 7, 2025

Full text

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
NELSON BOATYARD, INC., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) CIVIL ACTION 1:24-00349-KD-MU
)
VESSEL SALAMATI, a/f/k/a )
“SEA QUE II,” IMO No. 991061, )
Her engines, apparel, furniture, )
equipment, appurtenances, tackle, etc., )
in rem, and DWAYNE REITH, ) IN ADMIRALTY
in personam; ) IN REM
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
This action is before the Court on Plaintiff Nelson Boatyard, Inc.’s Motion for
Confirmation of Sale and Release of the Vessel SALAMATI, a/f/k/a “SEA QUE II,” IMO NO.
991061 (the “Vessel”), its engines, tackle, machinery, etc. (Doc. 32). Upon consideration, and for
the reasons below, the motion is GRANTED.
Plaintiff moves the Court to confirm the sale of the Vessel, her engines, apparel, furniture,
equipment, appurtenances, tackle, etc. to Nelson Boatyard, Inc. and to order the U.S. Marshall to
transfer title to Plaintiff. (Doc. 32). Plaintiff also requests an order for the release of the vessel
from seizure by the U.S. Marshal’s service and direct the substitute custodian to deliver possession
of the Vessel to Nelson Boatyard, Inc. (Doc. 32).
The record indicates that the Vessel was sold at public action by the U.S. Marshal on March
26, 2025. (Doc. 31). The sale was advertised and carried out in accordance with the local rules and
this Court’s Order of Sale. (Docs. 28, 30). Local Rule 104E(m)(2) provides that the provisions for
paying the Clerk a portion of the purchase price upon bid acceptance apply unless otherwise
ordered in the order of sale. S.D. Ala. CivLR 104E(m)(2). The Order of Sale stated that “if the
Case 1:24-cv-00349-KD-MU Doc# 33 Filed 04/07/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID#
<pageID>
2
highest bidder is Nelson Boatyard, Inc., a check will not be necessary as it may credit bid up to the
amount of the debt due as of the date of the sale.” (Doc. 28 at 6). Nelson Boatyard was the highest
and best bidder with a credit bid of $23,562.13. (Doc. 31). Further, more than three business days
has passed since the sale and no interested person has filed a written objection to the sale with the
Clerk of Court. See S.D. Ala. CivLR 104E(m)(6). Therefore, the Court is satisfied that the
requirements have been met to confirm the sale of the Vessel, 1 and Plaintiff’s Motion for
Confirmation of Sale and Release of the Vessel, (Doc. 32), is GRANTED.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the sale of the Vessel
SALAMATI, a/f/k/a “SEA QUE II,” IMO NO. 991061 (the “Vessel”), its engines, tackle,
machinery, etc. is hereby CONFIRMED and that the U.S. Marshal for the Southern District of
Alabama shall execute and deliver a Bill of Sale conveying to Plaintiff all right, title, and interest
in and to the Vessel, its engines, tackle, machinery, etc., free and clear of all liens, mortgages and
other encumbrances.
It is also ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Vessel SALAMATI, a/f/k/a
“SEA QUE II,” IMO NO. 991061 (the “Vessel”), its engines, tackle, machinery, etc. is hereby
RELEASED from its writ of arrest and seizure and that substitute custodian SHALL DELIVER
possession of the Vessel to Plaintiff, and that upon delivery, the substitute custodian shall be
DISCHARGED from its duties.
DONE and ORDERED this the 7th day of April 2025.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 “If no objection to the sale has been timely filed, the sale shall be confirmed by order of the Court no sooner than
five (5) days after the sale and no later than seven (7) days after the sale. The Marshal shall transfer title to the
purchaser upon the order of the Court.” S.D. Ala. CivLR 104E(m)(7).
Case 1:24-cv-00349-KD-MU Doc# 33 Filed 04/07/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID#
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.