Hadley v. Walmart Corporation

1:24-cv-00291AlsdJul 25, 2025

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SETH HADLEY, )
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-00291-KD-MU
)
WALMART STORES EAST, LP, )
Defendant. )
ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues
raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection
is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Doc.
22), is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 18), is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED this 25th day of July 2025.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:24-cv-00291-KD-MU Doc# 24 Filed 07/25/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID#
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.