Hadley v. Walmart Corporation

1:24-cv-00291AlsdDec 27, 2024

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SETH HADLEY, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
vs. 	) 	CIVIL ACTION NO. 24-00291-KD-MU
)
WALMART STORES EAST LP, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the
issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and dated December 3, 2024 (Doc. 11) is
ADOPTED, as modified herein, as the opinion of this Court.
Plaintiff Seth Hadley is granted leave to file, on or before January 28, 2025, an
Amended Complaint which corrects the deficiencies identified in the Report and
Recommendation. If Hadley does not file an Amended Complaint, then this action shall be
dismissed without prejudice on January 30, 2025, without further order by the Court.
Defendant Walmart Stores East LP’s motion to dismiss is DISMISSED as MOOT with
leave to refile.
DONE and ORDERED this 27th day of December 2024.
s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:24-cv-00291-KD-MU Doc# 13 Filed 12/27/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID#
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.