1:24-cv-00007•Carstarphen v. Reynolds et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ANDRE MAURICE CARSTARPHEN, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL ACTION: 24-0007-KD-N ) LEVEL REYNOLDS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER On June 3, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 53). After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and no objections having been filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that 1) Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendant Dr. Ronald Perdue, and Carstarphen’s claims against Dr. Perdue are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2) Defendants Warden Noah Price Oliver, Sgt. Carter, and Officer Brown’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This action remains pending as to Lieutenant Level Reynolds, Warden Oliver, Sgt. Carter, and Officer Brown. This action is set for jury selection and trial on March 3, 2026, and is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a scheduling order consistent with this Order and the Report and Recommendation. DONE and ORDERED this the 7th day of July 2025. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 1:24-cv-00007-KD-N Doc# 54 Filed 07/07/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID# <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.