Rone v. Rich et al

Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT EARL RONE, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	CIV. ACT. NO. 1:22-cv-509-TFM-N
)
ALEX LOTT,1 et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
)
THOMAS LAMAR RONE, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	CIV. ACT. NO. 1:23-cv-154-TFM-N
)
ALEX LOTT, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Consolidate (Civ. Act. No. 1:22-cv-
509, Doc. 109, filed 9/16/24; Civ. Act. No. 1:23-cv-154, Doc. 33, filed 9/16/24). For good cause,
it is ORDERED that the motions to consolidate for the purposes of discovery are GRANTED.
I. 	DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state: “[i]f actions before the court involve a common
question of law or fact, the court may: (1) join for hearing or trial any or all matters at issue in the
actions; (2) consolidate the actions; or (3) issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or
1 The Court noticed that the parties used the original lead defendant Ashley Rich in the header.
However, she was terminated from this action on December 8, 2023 when the Court dismissed her
from the action. 	See Doc. 62. 	Therefore, the Court corrects the header to the “next in line”
defendant which is Alex Lott – who is a defendant in both cases.
Case 1:22-cv-00509-TFM-N Doc# 110 Filed 09/16/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID#
<pageID>

Page 2 of 3
delay.” FED. R. CIV. P. 42(a). Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a) “is a codification of a trial court’s inherent
managerial power ‘to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and
effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.’” Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 776 F.2d
1492, 1495 (11th Cir. 1985) (citing In re Air Crash Disaster at Fla. Everglades, 549 F.2d 1006,
1012 (5th Cir. 1977)). However, as noted by the plain language in the use of the word “may,” the
Court’s decision under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a) is purely discretionary. See also Eghnayem v. Boston
Sci. Corp., 873 F.3d 1304, 1313 (11th Cir. 2017) (quoting Hendrix, 776 F.2d at 1495)
(emphasizing decision is “purely discretionary.”). 	In exercising that discretion, the Court must
take into account the following factors: (1) whether the specific risks of prejudice and possible
confusion are overborne by the risk of inconsistent adjudications of common factual and legal
issues; (2) the burden on parties, witnesses and available judicial resources posed by multiple
lawsuits; (3) the length of time required to conclude multiple suits as against a single one; and (4)
the relative expense to all concerned of the single-trial, multiple-trial alternatives. Id. Finally, the
Court may decide to consolidate for pretrial, trial, or both.
Turning to the situation at hand, the Court finds that the majority of the above factors are
met in favor of consolidation on discovery-matters. 	Additionally, Defendant Lott notes that no
party objects to the consolidation. The Court finds that consolidation for discovery is appropriate.
While normally the Court would direct the parties to file all discovery issues in the first-filed case,
the case at hand, the second filed case has already had some discovery. Therefore, for the purposes
of discovery-only, the parties shall file their discovery matters in the second case as discussed in
the conclusion.
II. 	CONCLUSION
For the reasons articulated above, it is ORDERED that the motions to consolidate (Civ.
Case 1:22-cv-00509-TFM-N Doc# 110 Filed 09/16/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID#
<pageID>

Page 3 of 3
Act. No. 1:22-cv-509, Doc. 109; Civ. Act. No. 1:23-cv-154, Doc. 33) are GRANTED.
The parties are also DIRECTED to use the consolidated header used on this order for all
discovery related matters. Any non-discovery motions that pertain to an individual case shall be
filed only in its original case with the single header.
The entry of an amended scheduling order is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge.
DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of September, 2024.
/s/ Terry F. Moorer
TERRY F. MOORER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:22-cv-00509-TFM-N Doc# 110 Filed 09/16/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID#
<pageID>