Smith v. Jackson et al

1:22-cv-00124AlsdJan 15, 2025

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DAVID LEE SMITH, AIS 164818, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
vs. 	) 	CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-0124-CG-B
)
HEATH JACKSON, et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant
to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and
Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of
the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the
opinion of this Court. Accordingly, the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(Doc. 81) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Smith’s action against Defendants Heath
Jackson, Richard Hetrick, and Kristy Godwin is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of January, 2025.
/s/ Callie V. Smith Granade
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:22-cv-00124-CG-B Doc# 89 Filed 01/15/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID#
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.