1:22-cv-00124•Smith v. Jackson et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DAVID LEE SMITH, AIS 164818, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-0124-CG-B ) HEATH JACKSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 81) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Smith’s action against Defendants Heath Jackson, Richard Hetrick, and Kristy Godwin is DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of January, 2025. /s/ Callie V. Smith Granade SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 1:22-cv-00124-CG-B Doc# 89 Filed 01/15/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID# <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.