CourtListener 10869473•Philip Seabrian v. Georgia Department of Human Services, Ex Rel. Mykael A. Williams
Philip Seabrian v. Georgia Department of Human Services, Ex Rel. Mykael A. Williams
CourtListener 10869473GactappJun 3, 2026
Full text
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
June 03, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26D0546. PHILIP SEABRIAN v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
SERVICES, EX REL. MYKAEL A. WILLIAMS.
In this child support recovery action, the trial court entered an order on March
25, 2026, finding Philip Seabrian in wilful contempt for failure to pay child support
and ordering him to pay both support and arrearage. Seabrian filed a direct appeal,
which we dismissed because he failed to follow the discretionary appeals procedure.
Case No. A26A1996 (May 22, 2026). On May 26, 2026, Seabrian filed this application
for discretionary appeal seeking to appeal the March 25 trial court order. We,
however, lack jurisdiction.
Seabrian’s application is untimely. An application for discretionary appeal must
be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d).
The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept
an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.
App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Seabrian’s application was untimely filed 62 days
after the trial court’s order.
Furthermore, the application essentially seeks an impermissible second appeal
of the trial court’s order. See Massey v. Massey, 294 Ga. 163, 165(2) (751 SE2d 330)
(2013) (“Where a party puts the machinery of immediate appellate review into
motion, yet commits a procedural default fatal to his appeal, that party is foreclosed
from thereafter resubmitting the matter for review on appeal. This rule is sometimes
framed in terms of res judicata or law of the case, but the appellate issue is more
fundamental; a party is not entitled to a second appeal from a single order.”) (citation
and punctuation omitted); Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Bullington, 227 Ga. 485, 485(2)
(181 SE2d 495) (1971) (“The effect of the dismissal of the first appeal from an
appealable judgment was to affirm the judgment of the trial court there excepted to ...
which was res judicata between the parties.”). Accordingly, this application is hereby
DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
06/03/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.