Reynolds v. State

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court
Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the
opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any
prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and
official text of the opinion.

In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: August 12, 2025

S25A0492. REYNOLDS v. THE STATE.

MCMILLIAN, Justice.

Jeremy Aloysius Reynolds, Jr., appeals his conviction for

malice murder arising from the shooting death of Barry Bullard. 1 In

his sole enumeration of error, Reynolds asserts that the evidence

was insufficient as a matter of constitutional due process to sustain

1 Bullard was killed on July 30, 2008. In September 2008, a Tift County

grand jury jointly indicted Reynolds, Neddrick Green, and Allen Williams for
malice murder and separately indicted Reynolds for possession of cocaine.
Williams was tried individually in February 2011 and convicted of malice
murder. Green and Reynolds were jointly tried before a jury in November 2010,
and both were found guilty of malice murder. Reynolds was also found guilty
of possession of cocaine. Both Williams’s and Green’s convictions were later
affirmed by this Court. See Williams v. State, 307 Ga. 689 (2020); Green v.
State, 302 Ga. 816 (2018). The trial court sentenced Reynolds as a recidivist to
serve life in prison without the possibility of parole for malice murder and a
concurrent term of 30 years for possession of cocaine. Reynolds timely filed a
motion for new trial, which was amended through new counsel on July 31,
2023. Following a hearing, the trial court denied the motion for new trial, as
amended, in August 2023. Reynolds timely filed his notice of appeal, and his
case was docketed to this Court’s April 2025 term and submitted for a decision
on the briefs.
his conviction for malice murder. 2 Because the evidence presented

at trial was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find

Reynolds guilty of malice murder beyond a reasonable doubt, we

affirm.3

The evidence presented at trial showed that Bullard had once

been friends with Reynolds’s co-defendants, Allen Williams and

Neddrick Green, but the men had a dispute, in which Williams felt

“betrayed” because he believed that Bullard had stolen a gun from

him. As a part of this “beef,” Bullard had repeated confrontations

with Williams. After Bullard’s home was shot at, Bullard reported

2 Reynolds does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence for his
conviction for possession of cocaine.
3 We take this opportunity to note that with the 14-year delay between

Reynolds’s sentencing and the docketing of his appeal in this Court, this appeal
joins “a recent raft of cases with lengthy, unexplained, and unjustified delays
between trial and appeal, both in this Court and in our Court of Appeals.”
Sturkey v. State, 319 Ga. 156, 164 (2024). Although some of the delay in this
case relates to evaluating Reynolds’s mental competency for purposes of his
ineffective assistance claim alleging counsel’s failure to obtain a mental
evaluation before trial, it appears that the case was essentially dormant
between 2010 and 2017, when current appellate counsel was appointed. It then
took another seven years to complete the mental evaluation, get a decision on
the motion for new trial, and have the appeal docketed in this Court. We
reiterate that it is the duty of all those involved in the criminal justice system,
including trial courts, prosecutors, defense counsel, and defendants “to ensure
that the appropriate post-conviction motions are filed, litigated, and decided
without unnecessary delay.” Id. at 164–65 (citation and punctuation omitted).
2
to police officers that Williams, Green, and Reynolds had been

driving by his home in Williams’s gold Lexus and that he thought

the three men “were after him.”

On the evening of July 30, 2008, Ernest Jackson went to

Bullard’s home in Tift County to let Bullard know that Williams was

driving through their neighborhood repeatedly “mugging” or

aggressively looking at their group. Jackson and Bullard went

outside with Michael Taylor, another friend of theirs. Taylor

testified that they saw Williams drive by, with Reynolds in the

passenger seat and Green in the back seat. They watched as

Williams backed into a parking lot across the street where Green got

out of the car, reached for an object, and then jumped back into the

car. Williams then drove “straight across full speed” to where Taylor,

Jackson, and Bullard were standing in the yard.

Taylor was afraid that they were “fixing to come shooting,” so

he went behind a building to hide. He heard Bullard challenge the

three men, “What y’all looking for us for? We ain’t scared of y’all.”

Green responded, “[S]hut up, n****r.” Williams said, “I’m ready to

3
die. I’ve been snorting all night.” Taylor also heard someone tell

Jackson, “[Y]ou lucky this ain’t got nothing to do with you.” Then he

heard a single gunshot followed by “a lot more shots.”

Jackson testified that he stayed in the yard and saw Bullard

with a gun that he kept “down by his side.” Williams and Green,

each carrying a gun, got out of the car and walked up to Jackson and

Bullard. Williams told Jackson, “[Y]ou lucky I know your folks,

otherwise I do something to you, too.” Bullard, who had accidentally

shot himself in the leg a few weeks prior, was still unable to walk

well and backed himself up against a tree in the yard. Green and

Williams began hitting Bullard in the face and trying to take the

gun out of Bullard’s hand. Bullard refused to relinquish his gun and

told them “to chill.” Jackson never saw Bullard raise his gun. When

they realized that Bullard was not going to hand over his gun, Green

and Williams started to walk away, but Reynolds “walked up and

just put the gun to [Bullard’s] head and shot him.” Jackson, fearing

for his safety, immediately ran away. Jackson identified Reynolds

as the shooter at trial.

4
Reynolds, Williams, and Green attempted to escape in

Williams’s Lexus, but they hit a mailbox and a trash can, which

lifted the car off the ground. One witness saw “the boys” get out of

the car and run from the scene. The first responding officer arrived

at the scene at 9:35 p.m., just two minutes after the initial 911 call

and saw “mass pandemonium” with residents “running

everywhere.” He found Bullard lying on the ground, breathing very

faintly. By the time paramedics arrived to assist, Bullard was

deceased. Officers discovered that the Lexus was still running with

the keys in the ignition and the doors open. Surveillance video

retrieved from the apartment complex across the street from where

the shooting occurred showed the Lexus backing into the apartment

complex and later crashing into a trash can. Fingerprints obtained

from the Lexus matched Reynolds’s fingerprints.

Tiffany Ewings, who lived in the apartment complex, testified

that she saw Williams’s gold Lexus back into a parking space in the

apartment complex with Williams, Green, and Reynolds, whom she

knew as “Miami,” inside. She saw Green get out of the car with “a

5
long gun” and look across the street, where Bullard “and all of them

boys” were standing. Then Green got back in the car, and the Lexus

“mashed across the street, like, varoom” into the yard across the

street. Shortly after that, she heard gunshots and looked out and

saw “the boys running off the scene.”

Shamira Wilcox was visiting her sister, who lived nearby, and

saw Taylor, Jackson, and Bullard in the yard near Bullard’s home.

After hearing a commotion, she heard Bullard say, “I ain’t got no

beef with y’all, I ain’t got no beef with y’all.” She then heard multiple

gunshots and called 911. Another witness, Linda Rogers, was

outside one block away when she heard gunshots. She then saw

Reynolds and Williams running down the street away from the

scene. She noticed that Williams was limping and that Reynolds was

trying to hold Williams up. She also saw that Reynolds was holding

a black handgun. Tyrone Lester was sitting outside speaking with

Rogers at the time. He ducked behind a car when he heard the

shooting and saw Reynolds running down the street, beckoning

Williams and saying, “[c]ome on, come on” to Williams. He saw

6
Reynolds carrying a black handgun.

Jocelyn Barnes, Williams’s girlfriend, testified that, when

Williams arrived at her home that evening, he was limping and said

that a man named Love had shot him. He also said that Bullard had

been shot but did not tell her who had shot him. Shortly thereafter,

Green and Reynolds also arrived at Barnes’s home. She thought that

Reynolds was being “hyperactive,” and he told her, “[W]ell, I

bumbaclot the n****r, MIA don’t play.”4 Reynolds was repeatedly

laughing, acting like he had won “a trophy” and saying, “Miami ain’t

no joke, MIA for life.”

The group eventually decided to go to a hospital to seek

treatment for Williams’s injury. Green’s brother arranged a ride

with his friend, Jarvis Watts, who drove Green’s brother, Williams,

Reynolds, and Barnes to a hospital in Ocilla, Georgia. During the

car ride, Barnes tried to determine who killed Bullard; Williams

would not tell her, but he repeatedly looked over his shoulder at

4 Barnes explained that “bumbaclot” was Jamaican slang for having
killed someone.
7
Reynolds. At the hospital, they signed Williams in under a false

name at Reynolds’s advice to avoid detection from police officers.

The group left Williams at the hospital and returned to Tifton.

The following morning, Willie Harris was sweeping around his

house located near the apartment complex across the street from

where the shooting occurred and found a gun in his yard. Harris

contacted law enforcement officers, who determined the weapon was

a 9mm Stallard Arms handgun. Rogers testified that the gun

appeared to be the same one she saw Reynolds holding as he ran

from the scene. One officer compared the outline of the barrel of that

firearm to the outline of the wound on Bullard’s face and found that

they were the same.

While officers were conducting a search of the home where

Green lived with his mother, they saw a foot sticking out from under

a couch, found Reynolds hiding there, and placed him under arrest.

Officers also recovered a sawed-off shotgun and a .38-caliber pistol

from the home. While Reynolds was being processed at the jail,

officers noticed Reynolds chewing on five yellow baggies with a

8
white powdery substance inside. A deputy collected the five baggies,

and a Georgia Bureau of Investigation agent tested the substance

inside, which tested positive for cocaine.

The medical examiner who performed Bullard’s autopsy

testified that Bullard had suffered a gunshot wound that entered his

left cheek and exited his right cheek, fracturing his facial bones and

injuring his tongue. Although the wound would not have been

immediately fatal, it caused excessive bleeding that traveled down

Bullard’s airway and asphyxiated him. The gunshot was fired at

contact range, meaning the gun was directly against Bullard’s face

when he was shot.

In his sole enumeration of error, Reynolds claims that the

evidence was not sufficient as a matter of constitutional due process

to support his conviction for malice murder. When this Court

reviews the sufficiency of the evidence as a matter of constitutional

due process, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to

the jury’s verdict and ask whether any rational trier of fact could

have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the

9
crimes of which he was convicted. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 US

307, 319 (1979). “This limited review leaves to the jury the

resolution of conflicts in the evidence, the weight of the evidence, the

credibility of witnesses, and reasonable inferences to be made from

basic facts to ultimate facts.” Wilkerson v. State, 317 Ga. 242, 245

(2023) (citation and punctuation omitted). We conclude that the

evidence here, as testified to by multiple eyewitnesses at the scene

and by Barnes, was more than sufficient to sustain Reynolds’s

conviction for malice murder. See Dillard v. State, 321 Ga. 171, 174–

75 (2025) (evidence was sufficient as a matter of constitutional due

process to support appellant’s conviction for malice murder where

eyewitness testified at trial that appellant shot the victim in the side

of the face after the victim resisted appellant’s efforts to take his

belongings).

Reynolds nonetheless argues that the evidence was insufficient

because the State failed to present confession evidence, DNA

evidence, or video or photographic evidence positively identifying

Reynolds as the shooter and because the State failed to identify a

10
motive for the malice murder of Bullard. These arguments fail.

We have previously explained that, “although the State is

required to prove its case with competent evidence, there is no

requirement that it prove its case with any particular sort of

evidence.” Ellington v. State, 314 Ga. 335, 341 (2022) (cleaned up).

See also Jones v. State, 319 Ga. 758, 761 (2024) (“[T]he fact that the

State did not produce certain types of evidence does not mean that

the evidence was insufficient.” (citation and punctuation omitted)).

Nor is the State required to introduce evidence of motive in order to

support a guilty verdict on the charge of malice murder. See Adams

v. State, 318 Ga. 105, 112–13 (2024) (explaining that evidence of

motive for murder is always relevant, but it is not required because

motive is not an essential element of the crime). For these reasons,

we reject Reynolds’s arguments that the evidence was insufficient

as a matter of constitutional due process to support his malice

murder conviction.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Land, J., not
participating.

11