Florida Public Service Commission native order document 09742-2024

FILED 10/31/2024
DOCUMENT NO. 09742-2024
FPSC - COMMISSION CLERK
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
In re: Energy conservation cost recovery
clause.
---------------~
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
ISSUED: October 31, 2024
PREHEARING ORDER
Pursuant to Notice and in accordance with Rule 28-106.209, Florida Administrative Co de
(F.A.C.), a Prehearing Conference was held on October 24, 2024, in Tallahassee, Florida, before
Commissioner Gabriella Passidomo, as Prehearing Officer.
APPEARANCES:
JOEL 	T. 	BAKER, 	MARIA 	JOSE 	MONCADA, 	and 	WILLIAM 	P. 	COX,
ESQUIRES, 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, Florida 33408
On behalf of FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMP ANY (FPL).
DIANNE M. TRIPLETT, ESQUIRE, 299 First Avenue North, St. Petersburg,
Florida 33701
MATTHEW 	R. 	BERNIER, 	STEPHANIE 	A. 	CUELLO, 	and 	ROBERT 	L.
PICKELS, ESQUIRES, 106 East Co lle ge A venue, Suite 800, Tallahassee, Florida
32301
On behalf of DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC (DEF).
J. JEFFRY WAHLEN, MALCOLM N. MEANS, and VIRGINIA L. PONDER,
ESQUIRES, Ausley McMullen, Post Office Box 391, Tallahassee, Florida 32302
On behalf of TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY (TECO).
BETH KEATING, ESQUIRE, Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., 215 South
Monroe Street, Suite 601, Tallahassee, Florida 32301
On behalf of FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMP ANY (FPUC).
WALT 	TRIERWEILER, 	CHARLES 	J. 	REHWINKEL, 	PATRICIA 	A.
CHRISTENSEN, MARY A. WESSLING, OCTAVIO PONCE, and AUSTIN
WATROUS, ESQUIRES, c/o The Florida Legislature, 111 West Madison Street,
Suite 812, Tallahassee, Florida 32399
On behalf of the OFFICE OF PUBLIC COUNSEL (OPC).
JON C. MOYLE, JR . and KAREN A. PUTNAL, ESQUIRES, Moyle Law Firm,
P.A. 118 North Gadsden Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32301
On behalf of FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL POWER USERS GROUP (FIPUG).

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 2
PETER J. MATTHEIS, MICHAEL K. LAVANGA, and JOSEPH R. BRISCAR,
ESQUIRES, Stone, Mattheis, Xenopoulos & Brew, PC, 1025 Thomas Jefferson
Street, NW, Eighth Floor, West Tower, Washington, D.C. 20007
On behalf of NUCOR STEEL FLORIDA, INC. (Nucor).
JAMES W. BREW, LAURA WYNN BAKER, and SARAH B. NEWMAN,
ESQUIRES, Stone, Mattheis, Xenopoulos & Brew, PC, 1025 Thomas Jefferson
Street, NW, Eighth Floor, West Tower, Washington, D.C. 20007
On behalf of WHITE SPRINGS AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS INC. d/b/a
PCS PHOSPHATE – WHITE SPRINGS (PCS Phosphate).
CARLOS M. MARQUEZ II, SAAD FAROOQI, and JACOB IMIG, ESQUIRES,
Florida Public Service Commission, 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee,
Florida 32399
On behalf of FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF (Staff).
MARY ANNE HELTON, ESQUIRE, Deputy General Counsel, Florida Public
Service Commission, 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-
0850
Advisor to the Florida Public Service Commission.
KEITH C. HETRICK, ESQUIRE, General Counsel, Florida Public Service
Commission, 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850
Florida Public Service Commission General Counsel.
I. 	CASE BACKGROUND
The Energy Conservation Cost Recovery Clause allows electric public utilities to seek
recovery of costs for energy conservation programs on an annual basis, pursuant to Sections
366.80–366.83, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Chapter 25-17, F.A.C. As part of the Florida Public
Service Commission’s (Commission) continuing energy conservation cost recovery proceedings,
an administrative hearing in this docket is set for November 5–7, 2024.
II. 	CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS
Pursuant to Rule 28-106.211, F.A.C., this Prehearing Order is issued to prevent delay and
to promote the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of all aspects of this case.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 3
III. 	JURISDICTION
This Commission is vested with jurisdiction over this subject matter by the provisions of
Chapters 120 and 366, F.S. This hearing will be governed by said Chapters and by Chapters 25-
6, 25-22, 28-106, and 28-109, F.A.C., as well as any other applicable provisions of law.
IV. 	PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Information for which proprietary confidential business information status is requested
pursuant to Section 366.093, F.S., and Rule 25-22.006, F.A.C., shall be treated by the
Commission as confidential. The information shall be exempt from Section 119.07(1), F.S.,
pending a formal ruling on such request by the Commission or pending return of the information
to the person providing the information. If no determination of confidentiality has been made and
the information has not been made a part of the evidentiary record in this proceeding, it shall be
returned to the person providing the information. If a determination of confidentiality has been
made and the information was not entered into the record of this proceeding, it shall be returned
to the person providing the information within the time period set forth in Section 366.093, F.S.
The Commission may determine that continued possession of the information is necessary for
the Commission to conduct its business.
It is the policy of this Commission that all Commission hearings be open to the public at
all times. The Commission also recognizes its obligation pursuant to Section 366.093, F.S., to
protect proprietary confidential business information from disclosure outside the proceeding.
Therefore, any party wishing to use any proprietary confidential business information, as that
term is defined in Section 366.093, F.S., at the hearing shall adhere to the following:
(1) 	When confidential information is used in the hearing that has not been filed as
prefiled 	testimony 	or 	prefiled 	exhibits, 	parties 	must 	have 	copies 	for 	the
Commissioners, necessary Staff, and the court reporter, in red envelopes clearly
marked with the nature of the contents and with the confidential information
highlighted. Any party wishing to examine the confidential material that is not
subject to an order granting confidentiality shall be provided a copy in the same
fashion as provided to the Commissioners, subject to execution of any appropriate
protective agreement with the owner of the material.
(2) 	Counsel and witnesses are cautioned to avoid verbalizing confidential information
in such a way that would compromise confidentiality. Therefore, confidential
information should be presented by written exhibit when reasonably possible.
At the conclusion of that portion of the hearing that involves confidential information, all
copies of confidential exhibits shall be returned to the proffering party. If a confidential exhibit
has been admitted into evidence, the copy provided to the court reporter shall be retained in the
Office of Commission Clerk’s confidential files. If such material is admitted into the evidentiary
record at hearing and is not otherwise subject to a request for confidential classification filed

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 4
with the Commission, the source of the information must file a request for confidential
classification of the information within 21 days of the conclusion of the hearing, as set forth in
Rule 25-22.006(8)(b), F.A.C., if continued confidentiality of the information is to be maintained.
V. 	PREFILED TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS; WITNESSES
Testimony of all witnesses to be sponsored by the parties (and Staff) has been prefiled
and will be inserted into the record as though read after the witness has taken the stand and
affirmed the correctness of the testimony and associated exhibits. All testimony remains subject
to timely and appropriate objections. Upon insertion of a witness’ testimony, exhibits appended
thereto may be marked for identification. Each witness will have the opportunity to orally
summarize his or her testimony at the time he or she takes the stand. Summaries of testimony
shall be limited to three minutes.
Witnesses are reminded that, on cross-examination, responses to questions calling for a
simple, “Yes” or “No,” answer shall be so answered first, after which the witness may explain
his or her answer. After all parties and Staff have had the opportunity to cross-examine the
witness, the exhibit may be moved into the record. All other exhibits may be similarly identified
and entered into the record at the appropriate time during the hearing.
The Commission frequently administers the testimonial oath to more than one witness at
a time. Therefore, when a witness takes the stand to testify, the attorney calling the witness is
directed to ask the witness to affirm whether he or she has been sworn.
The parties shall avoid duplicative or repetitious cross-examination. Further, friendly
cross-examination will not be allowed. Cross-examination shall be limited to witnesses whose
testimony is adverse to the party desiring to cross-examine. Any party conducting what appears
to be a friendly cross-examination of a witness should be prepared to indicate why that witness’
direct testimony is adverse to its interests.
VI. 	ORDER OF WITNESSES
Each witness whose name is preceded by an asterisk (*) is excused from appearing at the
final hearing. Their respective testimonies will be entered into the record as though read and
exhibits admitted.
Witness 	Proffered By 	Issues #
Direct
* Richard L. Hume 	FPL 	1–7, 10

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 5
Witness 	Proffered By 	Issues #
* L. Kay Hill 	FPL 	1–2, 4–5
* Karla Rodriguez 	DEF 	1–7, 10
* M. Ashley Sizemore 	TECO 	1–10
* Derrick M. Craig 	FPUC 	1–7, 10
VII. 	BASIC POSITIONS
FPL: 	FPL’s 2025 Conservation Cost Recovery Factors for the January 2025 through
December 2025 recovery period, which include the 2023 net final true-up for FPL
and the 2024 actual/estimated true-up for FPL, are appropriate and reasonable and
should be approved.
DEF: 	The 	Commission 	should 	determine 	that 	DEF 	has 	properly 	calculated 	its
conservation cost recovery true-up and projection costs and should approve the
conservation cost recovery factors for the period January 2025 through December
2025 set forth in the testimony and exhibits of witness Karla Rodriguez.
TECO: 	The 	Commission 	should 	determine 	that 	TECO 	properly 	calculated 	its
conservation cost recovery true-up and projections and the conservation cost
recovery factors set forth in the direct testimony and exhibits of witness M.
Ashley Sizemore for the period January 2025 through December 2025.
The Commission should approve the Contracted Credit Value in accordance with
Order No. PSC-2021-0423-S-EI, issued November 10, 2021, in Docket No.
20210034, for the GSLM-2 and GSLM-3 rate riders for use during the period
January 2025 through December 2025.
The Commission should also approve the Residential Price Responsive Load
Management (RSVP-1) rate tiers for TECO for the period January 2025 through
December 2025 as set forth in witness Sizemore’s testimony and exhibits.
FPUC: 	The Commission should approve FPUC’s final net true-up for the period January
through December 2023, the estimated true-up for the period January through
December 2024, and the projected conservation program expenses for the period
January through December 2025.
OPC: 	The utilities bear the burden of proof to justify the recovery of costs they request
in this docket. The utilities must carry this burden regardless of whether or not the
intervenors provide evidence to the contrary. Further, the utilities bear the burden

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 6
of proof to support their proposals seeking the Commission’s adoption of policy
statements (whether new or changed) or other affirmative relief sought. Even if
the Commission has previously approved a program, recovery of a cost, factor, or
adjustment as meeting the Commission’s own requirements, the utilities still bear
the burden of demonstrating that the costs submitted for final recovery meet any
statutory tests and are reasonable in amount and prudently incurred. Further,
recovery of even prudently incurred costs is constrained by the Commission’s
obligation to set fair, just, and reasonable rates. Further, pursuant to Section
366.01, F.S., the provisions of Chapter 366 must be liberally construed to protect
the public welfare.
FIPUG: 	The utilities bear the burden of proof to justify the recovery of costs they request in
this docket as reasonable and prudent. The utilities must carry this burden regardless
of whether FIPUG or other parties introduce evidence to the contrary. The utilities
must also carry their burden of proof to support their proposals asking the
Commission’s adoption of policy statements (whether new or changed) or other
affirmative relief sought.
NUCOR: 	Nucor’s basic position is that DEF bears the burden of proof to justify the costs it
seeks to recover through the Energy Conservation Cost Recovery Clause and any
other relief DEF requests in this proceeding.
PCS
Phosphate: 	PCS Phosphate generally adopts the positions taken by OPC unless a differing
position is specifically stated.
STAFF: 	Staff’s positions are preliminary and based on materials filed by the parties and on
discovery. The preliminary positions are offered to assist the parties in preparing
for the hearing. Staff’s final positions will be based upon all the evidence in the
record and may differ from the preliminary positions stated herein.
VIII. 	ISSUES AND POSITIONS
GENERIC CONSERVATION COST RECOVERY ISSUES
ISSUE 1: 	What are the final conservation cost recovery adjustment true-up amounts
for the period January 2023 through December 2023?
Proposed stipulation – See Section X infra.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 7
ISSUE 2: 	What are the appropriate conservation adjustment actual/estimated true-up
amounts for the period January 2024 through December 2024?
Proposed stipulation – See Section X infra.
ISSUE 3: 	What are the appropriate total conservation adjustment true-up amounts to
be collected/refunded in the period January 2025 through December 2025?
Proposed stipulation – See Section X infra.
ISSUE 4: 	What are the total conservation cost recovery amounts to be collected during
the period January 2025 through December 2025?
Proposed stipulation – See Section X infra.
ISSUE 5: 	What are the conservation cost recovery factors for the period January 2025
through December 2025?
Proposed stipulation – See Section X infra.
ISSUE 6: 	What should be the effective date of the new conservation cost recovery
factors for billing purposes?
Proposed stipulation – See Section X infra.
ISSUE 7: 	Should 	the 	Commission 	approve 	revised 	tariffs 	reflecting 	the 	energy
conservation cost recovery factors determined to be appropriate in this
proceeding?
Proposed stipulation – See Section X infra.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 8
COMPANY-SPECIFIC CONSERVATION COST RECOVERY ISSUES
Tampa Electric Company
ISSUE 8: 	What is the Contracted Credit Value for the GSLM-2 and GSLM-3 rate
riders for Tampa Electric Company for the period January 2025 through
December 2025?
Proposed stipulation – See Section X infra.
ISSUE 9: 	What are the residential Price Responsive Load Management (RSVP-1) rate
tiers for Tampa Electric Company for the period January 2025 through
December 2025?
Proposed stipulation – See Section X infra.
CLOSE THE DOCKET ISSUE
ISSUE 10: 	Should this docket be closed?
Proposed stipulation – See Section X infra.
IX. 	EXHIBIT LIST
Witness 	Proffered By 	Description
Direct
L. Kay Hill
Richard L. Hume
FPL 	LKH-1 	2023 Final True-up Schedules CT-2,
CT-3, CT-5 and CT-6, Appendix A
2023 Final True-up Schedules CT-1 -
CT-4
2023 Final True-up Capital
Structure/Cost Rates

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 9
Witness 	Proffered By 	Description
L. Kay Hill
Richard L. Hume
FPL 	LKH-2 	2025 Projection Schedule C-2
2024 Actual/Estimated Schedule C-3
Schedule C-5
2025 Projection Schedule C-1 and C-2
2025 Projection Capital Structure/Cost
Rates
2024 Actual/Estimated Schedule C-3
and C-4
2024 Actual/Estimated Capital
Structure/Cost Rates
Karla Rodriguez 	DEF 	KR-1T 	ECCR Adjusted Net True-Up for
January - December 2023, Schedules
CT1 – CT6
Karla Rodriguez 	DEF 	KR-1P 	Estimated/Actual True-Up, January –
December 2024 and ECCR Factors for
Billings in January – December 2025,
Schedules C1 – C6
M. Ashley Sizemore 	TECO 	MAS-1 	Schedules supporting cost recovery
factor actual January 2023-December
2023
M. Ashley Sizemore 	TECO 	MAS-2 	Schedules supporting conservation
costs projected for the period January
2025-December 2025 (2021 rate case)
M. Ashley Sizemore 	TECO 	MAS-3 	Schedules Supporting conservation
costs projected for the period January
2025-December 2025 (2024 rate case)
Derrick M. Craig 	FPUC 	DMC-1 	Schedules CT-1, CT-2, CT-3, CT-4,
CT-5 and CT-6
Derrick M. Craig 	FPUC 	DMC-2 	Schedules C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and C-5
Revised filed September 12, 2024

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 10
X. 	PROPOSED STIPULATIONS
After the Prehearing Conference, the four investor-owned electric utilities reached Type 2
stipulations1 with Commission Staff concerning all issues identified for resolution at the final
hearing. The intervenors (OPC, FIPUG, Nucor, and PCS Phosphate) take no position on any of
the proposed stipulations.2
GENERIC CONSERVATION COST RECOVERY ISSUES
ISSUE 1: 	What are the final conservation cost recovery adjustment true-up amounts
for the period January 2023 through December 2023?
STIPULATION:
The appropriate final conservation cost recovery adjustment true-up amounts for
the period January 2023 through December 2023 are as follows:
FPL
$2,466,525, over-recovery, as reflected in Schedule CT-1, Page 2 of 87, in Exhibit
LKH-1.
DEF
$3,699,623, over-recovery, as reflected in Schedule CT-1, Page 1 of 1, in Exhibit
KR-1T.
TECO
$846,045, over-recovery, as reflected in Schedule CT-1, Page 1 of 1, in Exhibit
MAS-1.
FPUC
$49,567, under-recovery, as reflected in Schedule CT-1, Page 1 of 1, in Revised
Exhibit DMC-1.
1 A “Type 2 stipulation” occurs on an issue when the utility and Commission Staff, or the utility and at least one
party adversarial to the utility, agree on the resolution of the issue and the remaining Parties (including Commission
Staff if it does not join in the agreement) do not object to the Commission relying upon the agreed language to
resolve that issue in a final order.
2 The intervenors take no position on these issues nor do they have the burden of proof related to them. As such,
they represent that they will not contest or oppose the Commission taking action approving a proposed stipulation
between the utilities and Commission Staff as a final resolution of these issues. No person is authorized to state that
OPC, FIPUG, Nucor, or PCS Phosphate is a participant in, or party to, a stipulation on these issues, either in this
docket, in an order of the Commission, or in a representation to a Court.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 11
ISSUE 2: 	What are the appropriate conservation adjustment actual/estimated true-up
amounts for the period January 2024 through December 2024?
STIPULATION:
The appropriate conservation adjustment actual/estimated true-up amounts for the
period January 2024 through December 2024 are as follows:
FPL
$2,424,807, over-recovery, as reflected in Schedule C-3, Page 28 of 34, Lines 5
plus 6, in Exhibit LKH-2.
DEF
$9,465,946, over-recovery, which is calculated by taking the difference from the
amount in Issue 1 from the $13,165,569 (over-recovery), that is reflected in
Schedule C-3, Page 5 of 5, in Exhibit KR-1P.
TECO
$4,562,499, under-recovery, as reflected in Schedule C-3, Page 12 of 13, in
Exhibit MAS-2.
FPUC
$80,486, over-recovery, which is calculated by taking the difference from the
amount in Issue 1 from the $30,919 (over-recovery), that is reflected in Schedule
C-3, Page 4 of 5, in Revised Exhibit DMC-2.
ISSUE 3: 	What are the appropriate total conservation adjustment true-up amounts to
be collected/refunded in the period January 2025 through December 2025?
STIPULATION:
The 	appropriate 	total 	conservation 	adjustment 	true-up 	amounts 	to 	be
collected/refunded in the period January 2025 through December 2025 are as
follows:
FPL
$4,891,332, over-recovery, as reflected in Schedule C-3, Page 28 of 34, in Exhibit
LKH-2.
DEF
$13,165,569, over-recovery, as reflected in Schedule C-3, Page 5 of 5, in Exhibit
KR-1P.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 12
TECO
$3,716,454, under-recovery, as reflected, Schedule C-3, Page 12 of 13, in Exhibit
MAS-2.
FPUC
$30,919, over-recovery, as reflected in Schedule C-3, Page 4 of 5, Line 11, in
Revised Exhibit DMC-2.
ISSUE 4: 	What are the total conservation cost recovery amounts to be collected during
the period January 2025 through December 2025?
STIPULATION:
The appropriate total conservation cost recovery amounts to be collected during
the period January 2025 through December 2025 are as follows:
FPL
$161,640,931, which is calculated by taking the amount in Issue 3 from the
$166,532,263 amount that is reflected in Schedule C-1, Page 2 of 34, in Exhibit
LKH-2.
DEF
$118,656,282, which is calculated by taking the amount in Issue 3 from the Total
Demand and Energy Costs amount, $131,821,851, as reflected in Schedule C-2,
Line 22, Page 1 of 4, in Exhibit KR-1P.
TECO
$52,109,529, which is calculated by adding the amount in Issue 3 to the
$48,393,075 amount that is reflected in Schedule C-2, Page 1 of 8, in Exhibit
MAS-2.
FPUC
$731,931, which is calculated by taking the amount in Issue 3 from the Total
Incremental Costs amount, $762,850, as reflected in Schedule C-1, Line 3, Page 1
of 1, in Revised Exhibit DMC-2.
ISSUE 5: 	What are the conservation cost recovery factors for the period January 2025
through December 2025?
STIPULATION:
The appropriate conservation cost recovery factors for the period January 2025
through December 2025 are as follows:

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 13
FPL
DEF
2025 ECCR Cost Recovery Factors,
as reflected in Schedule C-1, Page 2 of 2, in Exhibit KR-1P
Retail Rate Schedule
Cost Recovery Factor (Cents/kWh)
Voltage Level
Secondary 	Primary 	Transmission
Residential: RS-1, RST-1, RSL-1, RSL-2 	0.326 	N/A 	N/A
General Service Non-Demand: GS-1, GST-1,
GSLM-1, GLMS-2 0.286 	0.283 	0.280
General Service (100% Load Factor): GS-2 	0.222 	N/A 	N/A
Lighting: LS-1 	0.110 	N/A 	N/A
2025 ECCR Cost Recovery Factors as reflected in
Schedule C-1, Page 4 of 34, in Exhibit LKH-2
Rate Class
Conservation
Recovery Factor
($/kW)
Conservation
Recovery Factor
(Cents/kWh)
Reservation
Demand
Charge:
RDC
($/kW)
Daily
Demand
Charge:
SDD
($/kW)
RS1/RTR1 	- 	0.138 	- 	-
GS1/GST1 	- 	0.127 	- 	-
GSD1/GSDT1/HLFT1/GSD1-EV 	0.45 	- 	- 	-
OS2 	- 	0.074 	- 	-
GSLD1/GSLDT1/CS1/
CST1/HLFT2/GSLD1-EV 0.51 	- 	- 	-
GSLD2/GSLDT2/CS2/
CST2/HLFT3 0.51 	- 	- 	-
GSLD3/GSLDT3/CS3/CST3 	0.52 	- 	- 	-
SST1T 	- 	- 	0.06 	0.03
SST1D1/SST1D2/SST1D3 	- 	- 	0.06 	0.03
CILC D/CILC G 	0.54 	- 	- 	-
CILC T 	0.54 	- 	- 	-
MET 	0.44 	- 	- 	-
OL1/SL1/SL1M/PL1/OSI/II 	- 	0.039 	- 	-
SL2/SL2M/GSCU1 	- 	0.099 	- 	-

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 14
2025 ECCR Cost Recovery Factors,
as reflected in Schedule C-1, Page 2 of 2, in Exhibit KR-1P
Retail Rate Schedule
Cost Recovery Factor
(Dollars/kW-month)
Voltage Level
Secondary 	Primary 	Transmission
General Service Demand: GSD-1, GSDT-1,
GSLM-1, GSLM-2, SS-1 0.890 	0.880 	0.870
Curtailable: CS-2, CST-2, CS-3, CST-3, SS-3 	0.630 	0.620 	0.620
Interruptible: IS-2, IST-2, SS-2 	0.770 	0.760 	0.750
Standby Monthly: SS-1, SS-2, SS-3 	0.087 	0.086 	0.085
Standby Daily: SS-1, SS-2, SS-3 	0.041 	0.041 	0.040
TECO
2025 ECCR Cost Recovery Factors,
as reflected in Schedule C-1c, Page 1 of 1, in Exhibit MAS-2
Retail Rate Schedule
Cost Recovery Factor (Cents/kWh)
Voltage Level
Secondary 	Primary 	Subtransmission
RS 	0.294 	N/A 	N/A
GS and CS 	0.292 	N/A 	N/A
GSD Optional 	0.210 	0.208 	0.206
LS1 and LS2 	0.456 	N/A 	N/A
2025 ECCR Cost Recovery Factors,
as reflected in Schedule C-1c, Page 1 of 1, in Exhibit MAS-2
Retail Rate Schedule
Cost Recovery Factor (Dollars/kW)
Voltage Level
Secondary 	Primary 	Subtransmission
GSD and SBD 	0.86 	0.85 	0.84
GSLDPR and SBLDPR 	N/A 	0.80 	N/A
GSLDSU and SBLDSU 	N/A 	N/A 	0.87

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 15
FPUC
$0.00121 per kWh (consolidated levelized conservation cost recovery factor), as
reflected in Schedule C-1, Line 8, Page 1 of 1, in Revised Exhibit DMC-2.
ISSUE 6: 	What should be the effective date of the new conservation cost recovery
factors for billing purposes?
STIPULATION:
The factors shall be effective beginning with the specified conservation cost
recovery cycle and thereafter for the period January 2025 through December
2025. Billing cycles may start before January 1, 2025 and the last cycle may be
read after December 31, 2025, so that each customer is billed for 12 months
regardless of when the adjustment factor became effective. These charges shall
continue in effect until modified by subsequent order of this Commission.
ISSUE 7: 	Should 	the 	Commission 	approve 	revised 	tariffs 	reflecting 	the 	energy
conservation cost recovery factors determined to be appropriate in this
proceeding?
STIPULATION:
Yes. The Commission should approve revised tariffs reflecting the energy
conservation 	cost 	recovery 	factors 	determined 	to 	be 	appropriate 	in 	this
proceeding. The Commission should direct staff to verify that the revised tariffs
are consistent with the Commission’s decision.
The Commission should also grant staff administrative authority to approve
revised tariffs reflecting amended cost recovery clause factors that incorporate
any revisions that are necessary as a result of the Commission’s decision in
TECO’s current base rate case in Docket No. 20240026-EI.
COMPANY-SPECIFIC CONSERVATION COST RECOVERY ISSUES
ISSUE 8: 	What is the Contracted Credit Value for the GSLM-2 and GSLM-3 rate
riders for Tampa Electric Company for the period January 2025 through
December 2025?
STIPULATION:
In accordance with Order No. PSC-2021-0423-S-EI, issued November 10, 2021, in
Docket No. 202100034, the Contracted Credit Value (CCV) by Voltage Level for

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 16
the forthcoming cost recovery period, January 2025 through December 2025, for the
GSLM-2 and GSLM-3 rate riders will be:
Voltage Level 	Contracted Credit Value (dollars per kW)
Secondary 	11.75
Primary 	11.63
Subtransmission 	11.52
ISSUE 9: 	What are the residential Price Responsive Load Management (RSVP-1) rate
tiers for Tampa Electric Company for the period January 2025 through
December 2025?
STIPULATION:
For the period January 2025 through December 2025, the Residential Price
Responsive Load Management (RSVP-1) rates are as follows:
Rate Tier 	Cents per kWh
P1 	-3.053
P2 	-1.608
P3 	9.505
P4 	49.054
CLOSE THE DOCKET ISSUE
ISSUE 10: 	Should this docket be closed?
STIPULATION:
No. The Energy Conservation Cost Recovery Clause is a continuing docket that
remains open for administrative convenience and will receive a new docket
number next year.
XI. 	PENDING MOTIONS
There are no pending motions.
XII. 	PENDING CONFIDENTIALITY MATTERS
There are no pending confidentiality matters.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 17
XIII. 	POST-HEARING PROCEDURES
If no bench decision is made, each party shall file a post-hearing statement of issues and
positions. A summary of each position, set off with asterisks, shall be included in that statement.
If a party’s position has not changed since the issuance of this Prehearing Order, the post-hearing
statement may simply restate the prehearing position; however, if the prehearing position is
longer than 75 words, it must be reduced to no more than 75 words. If a party fails to file a post-
hearing statement, that party shall have waived all issues and may be dismissed from the
proceeding.
Pursuant to Rule 28-106.215, F.A.C., a party’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions
of law, if any, statement of issues and positions, and brief, shall together total no more than 40
pages and shall be filed at the same time.
XIV. 	RULINGS
Opening statements, if any, shall not exceed three minutes per party.
It is therefore,
ORDERED by Commissioner Gabriella Passidomo, as Prehearing Officer, that this
Prehearing Order shall govern the conduct of these proceedings as set forth above unless
modified by the Commission.

PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
31st
October 2024
ORDER NO.
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 18
By ORDER of Commissioner Gabriella Passidomo, as Prehearing Officer, this __ day
of ----- 	-
CMM
--Gabriella Passidomo
Commissioner and Prehearing Officer
Florida Public Service Commission
2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
(850) 413-6770
www.floridapsc.com
-
Copies furnished: 	A copy of this document is
provided to the parties of record at the time of
issuance and, if applicable, interested persons.

ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0466-PHO-EG
DOCKET NO. 20240002-EG
PAGE 19
NOTICE OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS OR JUDICIAL REVIEW
The Florida Public Service Commission is required by Section 120.569(1), Florida
Statutes, to notify parties of any administrative hearing or judicial review of Commission orders
that is available under Sections 120.57 or 120.68, Florida Statutes, as well as the procedures and
time limits that apply. This notice should not be construed to mean all requests for an
administrative hearing or judicial review will be granted or result in the relief sought.
Mediation may be available on a case-by-case basis. 	If mediation is conducted, it does
not affect a substantially interested person’s right to a hearing.
Any party adversely affected by this order, which is preliminary, procedural, or
intermediate in nature, may request: (1) reconsideration within 10 days pursuant to Rule 25-
22.0376, Florida Administrative Code; or (2) judicial review by the Florida Supreme Court, in
the case of an electric, gas, or telephone utility. A motion for reconsideration shall be filed with
the 	Office 	of 	Commission 	Clerk, 	in 	the 	form 	prescribed 	by 	Rule 	25-22.0376, 	Florida
Administrative Code. Judicial review of a preliminary, procedural, or intermediate ruling or
order is available if review of the final action will not provide an adequate remedy. Such review
may be requested from the appropriate court, as described above, pursuant to Rule 9.100, Florida
Rules of Appellate Procedure.