Florida Public Service Commission native order document 08302-2024

Order No. PSC-2024-0317-PCO-EIFlapubserv

Full text

FILED 8/8/2024
DOCUMENT NO. 08302-2024
FPSC - COMMISSION CLERK
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
In re: Petition for rate increase by Tampa
Electric Company.
In re: Petition for approval of 2023
depreciation and dismantlement study, by
Tampa Electric Company.
In re: Petition to implement 2024 generation
base rate adjustment provisions in paragraph 4
DOCKET NO. 20240026-EI
DOCKET NO. 20230139-EI
DOCKET NO. 20230090-EI
of the 2021 stipulation and settlement 	ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0317-PCO-EI
a reement, by Tam a Electric Com any. 	ISSUED: August 8, 2024~---~~---------~--~
ORDER GRANTING INTERVENTION
OF WALMART INC.
On April 2, 2024, Tampa Electric Company ("TECO") filed a petition, minimum filing
requirements, and testimony for an increase in base rates effective January 2025.
Petition for Intervention
Walmart Inc. ("Walmart") filed a Petition to Intervene on August 6, 2024. Petitioner
represents 	that it consulted with all 	the parties and none 	of them objects to Walmart's
intervention.
Walmart states it is a national retailer of goods and services throughout the United States.
Walmart further states that it is a large commercial customer of TECO, owning a nd operating
approximately 36 retail stores, a di stribution center, and related facilities in TECO's service
territory. Walmart asserts that these facilities collectively consume over 140.3 kWh of electricity
from TECO each year. Walmart alleges that the cost of electric service constitutes a significant
element of its cost of operation. Walmart asserts that its participation in this matter is appropriate
because the outcome of this proceeding could impact its costs.
Standard for Intervention
Pursuant to Rule 28-106.205, Florida Administrative Code ("F.A.C."), persons, other
than the original parties to a pending proceeding, who have a substantial interest in the
proceeding a nd who desire to become parties, may move for leave to intervene. Motions for
leave to intervene must be filed at least twenty (20) days before the final hearing, must comply
with Rule 28-106.204(3), F .A. C., and must include allegations sufficient to demonstrate that the
intervenor is entitled to participate in the proceeding as a matter of constitutional or statutory
right, pursuant to Commission rule, or that the substantial interests of the intervenor are subject
ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0317-PCO-EI
DOCKET NO. 20240026-EI
DOCKET NO. 20230139-EI
DOCKET NO. 20230090-EI
PAGE 2
to determination or will be affected through the proceeding. Intervenors take the case as they find
it.
To have standing, the intervenor must meet the two-prong test set forth in Agrico
Chemical Company v. Department of Environmental Regulation.1 The intervenor must show that
(1) they will suffer injury in fact which is of sufficient immediacy to entitle them to a Section
120.57, Florida Statutes, hearing, and (2) this substantial injury is of a type or nature which the
proceeding is designed to protect. The first aspect of the test deals with the degree of injury.2 The
second deals with the nature of the injury.3 The "injury in fact" must be both real and immediate
and not speculative or conjectural.4
Analysis & Ruling
Based on a review of the materials provided by Walmart, it appears that Walmart meets
the two-prong standing test established in Agrico. With respect to the first prong, Walmart is a
commercial customer of TECO whose cost for electric service allegedly constitutes a significant
element of its cost of operation. Walmart faces the prospect of paying higher electricity base
rates going forward. With respect to the second prong, this proceeding is designed for the very
purpose of determining base rates that customers like Walmart will be required to pay.
Therefore, Walmart meets the requirements for individual standing and will be permitted to
intervene as a party in this proceeding.
Based on the foregoing, it is
ORDERED by Commissioner Gary F. Clark, as Prehearing Officer, that the Petition to
Intervene by Walmart Inc. is hereby granted as set forth in the body of this Order. It is further
ORDERED that Walmart Inc. takes the case as it finds it. It is further
ORDERED that all parties to this proceeding shall furnish copies of all testimony,
exhibits, pleadings, and other documents which may hereinafter be filed in this proceeding to:
1 Agrico Chem. Co. v. Dep’t of Envtl. Regulation, 406 So. 2d 478, 481–82 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
2 Id. at 482.
3 Id.
4 Int’l Jai-Alai Players Ass’n v. Fla. Pari-Mutuel Comm’n, 561 So.2d 1224, 1225–26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); see also
Vill. Park Mobile Home Ass’n, Inc. v. State Dep’t of Bus. Regulation, 506 So.2d 426, 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev.
den., 513 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 1987) (noting speculation on the possible occurrence of injurious events was too remote).
ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0317-PCO-EI
DOCKET NO. 20240026-EI
DOCKET NO. 20230139-EI
DOCKET NO. 20230090-EI
PAGE 3
Stephanie U. Eaton, Esq.
Florida Bar No. 165610
Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC
110 Oakwood Drive, Suite 500
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
Telephone: (336) 631–1062
E-mail: SEaton@SpilmanLaw.com
Steven W. Lee (as Qualified Representative)
Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC
1100 Bent Creek Boulevard, Suite 101
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
Telephone: (717) 791–2012
Fax: (717) 795–2743
SLee@SpilmanLaw.com
By ORDER of Commissioner Gary F. Clark, as Prehearing Officer, this 8th day of
August, 2024.
GARY F. CLARK
Commissioner and Prehearing Officer
Florida Public Service Commission
2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
(850) 413-6770
www.floridapsc.com
Copies furnished: A copy of this document is
provided to the parties of record at the time of
issuance and, if applicable, interested persons.
CMM
ORDER NO. PSC-2024-0317-PCO-EI
DOCKET NO. 20240026-EI
DOCKET NO. 20230139-EI
DOCKET NO. 20230090-EI
PAGE 4
NOTICE OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS OR JUDICIAL REVIEW
The Florida Public Service Commission is required by Section 120.569(1), Florida
Statutes, to notify parties of any administrative hearing or judicial review of Commission orders
that is available under Sections 120.57 or 120.68, Florida Statutes, as well as the procedures and
time limits that apply. This notice should not be construed to mean all requests for an
administrative hearing or judicial review will be granted or result in the relief sought.
Mediation may be available on a case-by-case basis. If mediation is conducted, it does
not affect a substantially interested person's right to a hearing.
Any party adversely affected by this order, which is preliminary, procedural, or
intermediate in nature, may request: (1) reconsideration within 10 days pursuant to Rule 25-
22.0376, Florida Administrative Code; or (2) judicial review by the Florida Supreme Court, in
the case of an electric, gas, or telephone utility. A motion for reconsideration shall be filed with
the 	Office 	of 	Commission 	Clerk, 	in 	the 	form 	prescribed 	by 	Rule 	25-22.0376, 	Florida
Administrative Code. Judicial review of a preliminary, procedural, or intermediate ruling or
order is available if review of the final action will not provide an adequate remedy. Such review
may be requested from the appropriate court, as described above, pursuant to Rule 9.100, Florida
Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.