CourtListener 10866244•Robert James Bradley v. Department of Revenue
Robert James Bradley v. Department of Revenue
CourtListener 10866244FladistctappMay 29, 2026
Full text
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 6D2025-1664
Lower Tribunal No. 2019-1-DR
_____________________________
ROBERT JAMES BRADLEY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
Appellee.
_____________________________
Appeal from the Department of Revenue.
May 29, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Robert James Bradley appeals a final administrative child support order issued
by the Florida Department of Revenue. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.030(b)(1)(C); Fla. R. App. P. 9.190; §§ 120.68(1)(a), 409.2563(10)(a), Fla. Stat.
(2025). We affirm because he did not request a hearing on the Department’s
proposed final order, and he thus failed to preserve his appellate challenge to its
findings. See Feliciano v. Dep’t of Rev., Child Support Enf’t, 305 So. 3d 801, 803
(Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (“We note that the lack of a hearing and the resulting absence
of a transcript provides this Court with little basis to conclude that the Department’s
final order is not supported by the evidence.” (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of
Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979))). Bradley may seek a superseding
child support order from the circuit court if he can do so in good faith. See §
409.2563(10)(c).
AFFIRMED.
TRAVER, C.J., and SMITH and MIZE, JJ., concur.
Robert James Bradley, Punta Gorda, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah C. Prieto, Assistant
Attorney General, of the Office of Child Support Enforcement, Fort Lauderdale, for
Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.