CourtListener 4873756•Wayne C. Doty v. State of Florida
Full text
Supreme Court of Florida
THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 2021
CASE NO.: SC18-973
Lower Tribunal No(s).:
042011CF000498CFAXMX
WAYNE C. DOTY vs. STATE OF FLORIDA
Appellant(s) Appellee(s)
Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.
CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, and MUÑIZ,
JJ., concur.
LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion.
COURIEL and GROSSHANS, JJ., did not participate.
LABARGA, J., concurring.
As expressed in my concur in part, dissent in part opinion in
Doty v. State, 45 Fla. L. Weekly S66 (Fla. Feb. 13, 2020), I maintain
my dissent to the use of “determinations” instead of “findings” to
describe the requirements set forth in section 921.141(2)(b)2.,
Florida Statutes (2018). However, because I concurred in the
majority’s affirmance of Doty’s death sentence, I also agree with the
majority’s decision to deny rehearing.
CASE NO.: SC18-973
Page Two
A True Copy
Test:
so
Served:
JANINE D. ROBINSON
HON. JESSICA JOAN YEARY, PUBLIC DEFENDER
BARBARA J. BUSHARIS
CHARMAINE M. MILLSAPS
HON. WILLIAM E. DAVIS, JUDGE
LUIS E. BUSTAMANTE
RAY NORMAN, CLERK
HON. MARK W. MOSELEY, CHIEF JUDGE
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.