Susan Braun v. Tracey Sager, et al.

2024-1192Fladistctapp3

Full text

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed December 3, 2025.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1192
Lower Tribunal No. 19-5346-CP-02
________________
Susan Braun,
Appellant,
vs.
Tracey Sager, et al. ,
Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria de
Jesus Santovenia, Judge.
Susan Braun, in proper person.
Law 	Offices 	of 	Robert 	P. 	Frankel, 	P.A., 	and 	Robert 	P. 	Frankel
(Plantation), for appellee Jeff Braun; Gutter, Chaves and Sean M. Lebowitz
(Boca Raton), for appellee Tracey Sager.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Raimi v. Furlong, 702 So. 2d 1273, 1286 (Fla. 3d DCA
1997) (“It has long been emphasized that the right to dispose of one’s
property by will is highly valuable and it is the policy of the law to hold a last
will and testament good wherever possible.”); In re Shifflet’s Estate, 170 So.
2d 96, 98 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964) (“[T]he will in its original form was validly
executed and [was] entitled to probate[.]”); Taft v. Zack, 830 So. 2d 881, 883
(Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (“The will, as originally written, was [valid and] entitled to
be admitted to probate.”); Heasley v. Evans, 104 So. 2d 854, 857 (Fla. 2d
DCA 1958) (“An appellate court will not disturb the findings of fact and
conclusions of law of a probate court in a will contest unless there is a lack
of substantial competent evidence to support the findings or unless it is
clearly manifested that the trial judge misapprehended the legal effect of the
evidence in its entirety. . . . Accordingly, the order admitting the will to probate
is hereby affirmed.”).

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.