2024-0734•MANUEL FIGUEROA and NOEMI FIGUEROA VS UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
MANUEL FIGUEROA and NOEMI FIGUEROA VS UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
2024-0734Fla Dist Ct App 6th
Full text
S IXTH D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S TATE OF F LORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2024-0734 Lower Tribunal No. 2020-CA-001232-CI _____________________________ M ANUEL FIGUEROA and N OEMI FIGUEROA, Appellants, v. U NIVERSAL PROPERTY & C ASUALTY INSURANCE C OMPANY, Appellee. _____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County. Christine E. Arendas, Judge. December 12, 2025 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493, 499 (Fla. 1992) (“It is well settled that the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that raised below will not be heard on appeal.”); Melrose Ventures, LLC v. Uptempo Marketing Corp., 418 So. 3d 217, 220 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (“[N]ew and different arguments untimely raised for the first time in motions for rehearing which were denied are unpreserved.”). NARDELLA, WOZNIAK and WHITE, JJ., concur.
2 Melissa A. Giasi, of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants. David A. Noel and Kara Rockenbach Link, of Link & Rockenbach, PA, West Palm Beach, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. 6D2024-0734 Lower Tribunal No. 2020-CA-001232-CI MANUEL FIGUEROA and NOEMI FIGUEROA, Appellants, Vv. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County. Christine E. Arendas, Judge. December 12, 2025 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493, 499 (Fla. 1992) (“It is well settled that the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that raised below will not be heard on appeal.’’); Melrose Ventures, LLC v. Uptempo Marketing Corp., 418 So. 3d 217, 220 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (“[N]ew and different arguments untimely raised for the first time in motions for rehearing which were denied are unpreserved.’’). NARDELLA, WOZNIAK and WHITE, JJ., concur. Melissa A. Giasi, of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants. David A. Noel and Kara Rockenbach Link, of Link & Rockenbach, PA, West Palm Beach, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.