2025-0919•MATTHEW R. ENGLISH v. KRISSY N. ENGLISH
Full text
S IXTH D ISTRICT C OURT OF APPEAL S TATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2025-0919 Lower Tribunal No. 2025-DR-000565 _____________________________ M ATTHEW R. E NGLISH, Appellant, v. KRISSY N. ENGLISH, Appellee. _____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County. Russell T. Kirshy, Judge. January 30, 2026 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Pipher v. Pipher, 364 So. 3d 1134, 1134 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023) (“As in all cases such as this, the trial court was required to determine the credibility of the witnesses. It did so and found the facts adverse to [Appellant]. It is not the role of this Court to second-guess that decision.”). STARGEL, MIZE and PRATT, JJ., concur. Odelsa Flores-Dickman, of Dickman Law Firm, Naples, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee.
2 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. 6D2025-0919 Lower Tribunal No. 2025-DR-000565 MATTHEW R. ENGLISH, Appellant, Vv. Krissy N. ENGLISH, Appellee. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County. Russell T. Kirshy, Judge. January 30, 2026 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Pipher v. Pipher, 364 So. 3d 1134, 1134 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023) (“As in all cases such as this, the trial court was required to determine the credibility of the witnesses. It did so and found the facts adverse to [Appellant]. It is not the role of this Court to second-guess that decision.”). STARGEL, MIZE and PRATT, JJ., concur. Odelsa Flores-Dickman, of Dickman Law Firm, Naples, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.