2025-0398•Morgan v. State of Florida
Full text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TYRONE MARCEL MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D2025-0398 February 20, 2026 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip James Federico, Judge. Tyrone Marcel Morgan, pro se. PER CURIAM. We affirm the orders denying the motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and the motion for rehearing without prejudice to Tyrone Marcel Morgan's right to challenge his habitual felony offender designation in a facially sufficient motion filed under rule 3.800(a). See Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 603–04 (Fla. 2007) (holding a claim alleging a discrepancy between an oral and written sentence that can be resolved by the record is cognizable at any time under rule 3.800(a)). LUCAS, C.J., and VILLANTI and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
2 Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TYRONE MARCEL MORGAN, Appellant, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D2025-0398 February 20, 2026 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip James Federico, Judge. Tyrone Marcel Morgan, pro se. PER CURIAM. We affirm the orders denying the motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and the motion for rehearing without prejudice to Tyrone Marcel Morgan's right to challenge his habitual felony offender designation in a facially sufficient motion filed under rule 3.800(a). See Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 603-04 (Fla. 2007) (holding a claim alleging a discrepancy between an oral and written sentence that can be resolved by the record is cognizable at any time under rule 3.800(a)). LUCAS, C.J., and VILLANTI and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.