2025-3588•Lee V. Dixon v. State of Florida
Full text
D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LEE V. DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2025-3588 [February 18, 2026] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062008CF001221A88810. Lee V. Dixon, Bristol, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM . Affirmed. Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025), cert. denied, 145 S.Ct. 2789 (2025) (holding that even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change of law, it does not apply retroactively). K UNTZ , C.J., KLINGENSMITH and SHAW , JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LEE V. DIXON, Appellant, Vv. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2025-3588 [February 18, 2026] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062008CF001221A88810. Lee V. Dixon, Bristol, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025), cert. denied, 145 S.Ct. 2789 (2025) (holding that even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change of law, it does not apply retroactively). KUNTZ, C.J., KLINGENSMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.