2025-2911•Jesse Stone v. State of Florida
Full text
D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JESSE STONE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2025-2911 [December 10, 2025] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 561991CF001442. Jesse Stone, Bushnell, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM . Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (holding that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when it was decided). KUNTZ , C.J., FORST and SHAW , JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JESSE STONE, Appellant, Vv. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2025-2911 [December 10, 2025] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 561991CF001442. Jesse Stone, Bushnell, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (holding that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when it was decided). KUNTZ, C.J., FORST and SHAW, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.