Nathan Colson v. State of Florida

2025-3736Fladistctapp4

Full text

D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
NATHAN COLSON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-3736
[February 25, 2026]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard Isaac Bober,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 062018CF000204A88810.
Nathan Colson, Monticello, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
P ER CURIAM .
Affirmed. 	See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (holding
that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a
change of law, it does not apply retroactively); see also Maye v. State, 368
So. 3d 531, 532 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023), rev. granted, No. SC2023-1184, 2024
WL 1796831 (Fla. Apr. 25, 2024).
GERBER , CONNER and S HAW , JJ., concur.
* 	* 	*
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

NATHAN COLSON,
Appellant,

Vv.

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2025-3736
[February 25, 2026]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard Isaac Bober,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 062018CF000204A88810.

Nathan Colson, Monticello, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (holding
that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a
change of law, it does not apply retroactively); see also Maye v. State, 368
So. 3d 531, 532 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023), rev. granted, No. SC2023-1184, 2024
WL 1796831 (Fla. Apr. 25, 2024).

GERBER, CONNER and SHAW, Ju., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.