2025-1214•Juan Daniel Nava v. State of Florida
Full text
D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JUAN DANIEL NAVA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2025-1214 [April 1, 2026] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Michael James Linn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2022CF000513 A. Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. Solages-Jones, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM . Affirmed. See Thomas v. State, 51 Fla. L. Weekly D83 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 7, 2026) (holding that a defendant’s signed stipulation to certain facts precludes the claim on appeal that such a stipulation was not knowing or voluntary); Nelson v. State, 195 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1967) (holding that section 790.23, Florida Statutes, is constitutional under Article I, Section 8 of the Florida Constitution); accord Guillen v. State, 423 So. 3d 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025); see also Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022) (rejecting the claim that the federal constitution requires a twelve person jury). GROSS, CIKLIN and C ONNER , JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JUAN DANIEL NAVA, Appellant, Vv. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2025-1214 [April 1, 2026] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Michael James Linn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2022CF000513 A. Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. Solages-Jones, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Thomas v. State, 51 Fla. L. Weekly D83 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 7, 2026) (holding that a defendant’s signed stipulation to certain facts precludes the claim on appeal that such a stipulation was not knowing or voluntary); Nelson v. State, 195 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1967) (holding that section 790.23, Florida Statutes, is constitutional under Article I, Section 8 of the Florida Constitution); accord Guillen v. State, 423 So. 3d 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025); see also Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022) (rejecting the claim that the federal constitution requires a twelve person jury). GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.