Keith Malley v. State of Florida

2025-0086Fladistctapp4

Full text

D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
KEITH MALLEY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0086
[January 14, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2023-CF-007620-
AXXX-MB.
Carlos A. Canet of Law Office of Carlos A. Canet, P.A., Plantation, for
appellant.
James 	Uthmeier, 	Attorney 	General, 	Tallahassee, 	and 	Heidi 	L.
Bettendorf, 	Senior Assistant 	Attorney General, 	West 	Palm Beach, 	for
appellee.
PER CURIAM .
The 	defendant 	appeals 	his 	jury 	trial 	convictions 	for 	intentional
interference with custody, culpable negligence and misdemeanor battery.
We write to address only the defendant’s conviction for culpable negligence
(“Count 2”), which we reverse and remand for correction of the judgment.
On Count 2, the circuit court entered judgment against the defendant
for culpable negligence in violation of section 784.05(2), Florida Statutes
(2023) (a first-degree misdemeanor that requires proof of an actual injury).
The jury instructions explicitly stated that actual injury was not required
to convict the defendant of Count 2; instead, the State needed to prove
only that the defendant had exposed the child to personal injury and that
the defendant did so through culpable negligence.
The 	jury 	instructions 	thus 	described 	only 	a 	violation 	of 	section
784.05(1), Florida Statutes (2023) (a second-degree misdemeanor that
requires exposing another person to personal injury). 	Furthermore, the
2
State conceded no evidence existed of an actual injury to the child.
Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction for culpable negligence as a first-
degree misdemeanor was error. See Gibson v. State, 379 So. 3d 576, 578
(Fla. 5th DCA 2024).
Thus, we reverse the defendant’s conviction under Count 2 for culpable
negligence as a first-degree misdemeanor in violation of section 784.05(2),
and remand for Count 2 of the judgment to be corrected to reflect a
conviction for culpable negligence as a second-degree misdemeanor in
violation of section 784.05(1). 	See id. 	In all other respects, we affirm
without comment.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.
KUNTZ , C.J., C ONNER and S HAW , JJ., concur.
* 	* 	*
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

KEITH MALLEY,
Appellant,

Vv.

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2025-0086
[January 14, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2023-CF-007620-
AXXX-MB.

Carlos A. Canet of Law Office of Carlos A. Canet, P.A., Plantation, for
appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L.
Bettendorf, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for
appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his jury trial convictions for intentional
interference with custody, culpable negligence and misdemeanor battery.
We write to address only the defendant’s conviction for culpable negligence
(“Count 2”), which we reverse and remand for correction of the judgment.

On Count 2, the circuit court entered judgment against the defendant
for culpable negligence in violation of section 784.05(2), Florida Statutes
(2023) (a first-degree misdemeanor that requires proof of an actual injury).
The jury instructions explicitly stated that actual injury was not required
to convict the defendant of Count 2; instead, the State needed to prove
only that the defendant had exposed the child to personal injury and that
the defendant did so through culpable negligence.

The jury instructions thus described only a violation of section
784.05(1), Florida Statutes (2023) (a second-degree misdemeanor that
requires exposing another person to personal injury). Furthermore, the

State conceded no evidence existed of an actual injury to the child.
Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction for culpable negligence as a first-
degree misdemeanor was error. See Gibson v. State, 379 So. 3d 576, 578
(Fla. 5th DCA 2024).

Thus, we reverse the defendant’s conviction under Count 2 for culpable
negligence as a first-degree misdemeanor in violation of section 784.05(2),
and remand for Count 2 of the judgment to be corrected to reflect a
conviction for culpable negligence as a second-degree misdemeanor in
violation of section 784.05(1). See id. In all other respects, we affirm
without comment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.
KUNTZ, C.J., CONNER and SHAW, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.