Neely v. Entrekin

2025-1209Fladistctapp1

Full text

FIRST D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
S TATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2025-1209
_____________________________
M ARTIN T. NEELY , Former
Husband,
Appellant,
v.
LINDSAY J. E NTREKIN , Former
Wife,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.
William F. Stone and John T. Brown, Judges.
May 13, 2026
P ER C URIAM.
A FFIRMED. 	See King v. King, 363 So. 3d 1099, 1101 (Fla. 4th
DCA 2023) (Holding that “a judgment need not be reversed solely
because a trial court adopts a proposed order verbatim.” Instead,
there are various factors to be considered by an appellate court in
determining 	whether 	a 	judgment 	reflects 	a 	trial 	judge’s
independent decision-making).
B ILBREY , KELSEY , and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________
Not 	final 	until 	disposition 	of 	any 	timely 	and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Michael T. Webster of Michael T. Webster, P.A., Shalimar, for
Appellant.
Andrew 	D. 	Wheeler 	of 	The 	Wheeler 	Firm, 	PA, 	Niceville, 	for
Appellee.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2025-1209

MARTIN T. NEELY, Former
Husband,

Appellant,
Vv.

LINDSAY J. ENTREKIN, Former
Wife,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.
William F. Stone and John T. Brown, Judges.

May 13, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See King v. King, 363 So. 3d 1099, 1101 (Fla. 4th
DCA 2028) (Holding that “a judgment need not be reversed solely
because a trial court adopts a proposed order verbatim.” Instead,
there are various factors to be considered by an appellate court in
determining whether a judgment reflects a trial judge’s
independent decision-making).

BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.

Michael T. Webster of Michael T. Webster, P.A., Shalimar, for
Appellant.

Andrew D. Wheeler of The Wheeler Firm, PA, Niceville, for
Appellee.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.