2024-0818•Flowers v. State of Florida
Full text
FIRST D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S TATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-0818 _____________________________ B OOKER FLOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Stephen S. Everett, Judge. December 17, 2025 P ER C URIAM. Appellant raises two issues on direct appeal from his judgment and sentence. We affirm as to the first issue without comment. We also affirm as to the second issue, in which he argues that he must be resentenced without a prison releasee reoffender enhancement because the judge rather than the jury made the underlying findings of fact establishing he was subject to the enhancement. This argument is meritless because any error was harmless. See Sheffield v. State, No.1D2024-1587, 2025 WL 3288602, at *1 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 26, 2025) (affirming PRR sentence without deciding the impact, if any, of Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), because any error was harmless);
2 Hicks v. State, No. 1D2024-1300, 2025 WL 2921590 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 15, 2025) (same); Alonso v. State, 415 So. 3d 826, 827 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025) (same); Ashford v. State, 407 So. 3d 537, 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025) (same). A FFIRMED. B ILBREY , KELSEY , and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Ross Scott Haine, II, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Miranda Lee Butson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D2024-0818 BOOKER FLOWERS, Appellant, Vv. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Stephen S. Everett, Judge. December 17, 2025 PER CURIAM. Appellant raises two issues on direct appeal from his judgment and sentence. We affirm as to the first issue without comment. We also affirm as to the second issue, in which he argues that he must be resentenced without a prison releasee reoffender enhancement because the judge rather than the jury made the underlying findings of fact establishing he was subject to the enhancement. This argument is meritless because any error was harmless. See Sheffield v. State, No.1D2024-1587, 2025 WL 3288602, at *1 (Fla. lst DCA Nov. 26, 2025) (affirming PRR sentence without deciding the impact, if any, of Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), because any error was harmless); Hicks v. State, No. 1D2024-1300, 2025 WL 2921590 (Fla. lst DCA Oct. 15, 2025) (same); Alonso v. State, 415 So. 3d 826, 827 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025) (same); Ashford v. State, 407 So. 3d 537, 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025) (same). AFFIRMED. BILBREY, KELSEY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Ross Scott Haine, II, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Miranda Lee Butson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.