Sheffield v. State of Florida

2024-1587Fladistctapp1

Full text

FIRST D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
S TATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2024-1587
_____________________________
K ALEB SHEFFIELD,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA ,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Tiffany M. Baker-Carper, Judge.
November 26, 2025
P ER C URIAM.
Appellant, Kaleb Sheffield, raises two issues on appeal. 	We
affirm as to the first issue without further discussion. 	As to the
second issue in which Appellant challenges his prison releasee
reoffender (“PRR”) sentence because the trial court, not the jury,
found that he met the statutory qualifications, we affirm because
any error was harmless. 	See Hicks v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly
D2238a (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 15, 2025) (affirming the appellant’s
PRR sentence without deciding the impact, if any, of Erlinger v.
United 	States, 	602 	U.S. 	821 	(2024), 	because 	any 	error 	was
harmless); Alonso v. State, 415 So. 3d 826, 827 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025)
(same); Ashford v. State, 407 So. 3d 537, 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025)
(same).
AFFIRMED.
2
LEWIS, KELSEY , and TREADWELL , JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not 	final 	until 	disposition 	of 	any 	timely 	and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Ryan Edward McFarland of Kent & McFarland, Jacksonville, for
Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Christina Piotrowski,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2024-1587

KALEB SHEFFIELD,
Appellant,
Vv.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Tiffany M. Baker-Carper, Judge.

November 26, 2025
PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kaleb Sheffield, raises two issues on appeal. We
affirm as to the first issue without further discussion. As to the
second issue in which Appellant challenges his prison releasee
reoffender (“PRR”) sentence because the trial court, not the jury,
found that he met the statutory qualifications, we affirm because
any error was harmless. See Hicks v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly
D2238a (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 15, 2025) (affirming the appellant’s
PRR sentence without deciding the impact, if any, of Erlinger v.
United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), because any error was
harmless); Alonso v. State, 415 So. 3d 826, 827 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025)
(same); Ashford v. State, 407 So. 3d 537, 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025)
(same).

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331,

Ryan Edward McFarland of Kent & McFarland, Jacksonville, for
Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Christina Piotrowski,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.