2024-2366•Stewart v. State of Florida
Full text
FIRST D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S TATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-2366 _____________________________ M ARCUS W AYNE STEWART , Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge. April 15, 2026 P ER C URIAM. A FFIRMED. See Coleman v. State, 315 So. 3d 166, 168 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (concluding that argument to trial court that statements were unreliable, without “assert[ing] that the trial court’s findings were legally insufficient,” fails to preserve a sufficiency challenge under section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes); Bass v. State, 35 So. 3d 43, 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (citing Reynolds v. State, 660 So. 2d 778, 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)) (finding section 90.403 challenge unpreserved where objection in trial court addressed bolstering, prior consistent statements, and cumulativeness but did not raise the balancing test under section 90.403). R OBERTS, W INOKUR , and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, Tallahassee, and Kevin P. Steiger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D2024-2366 MARCUS WAYNE STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge. April 15, 2026 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Coleman v. State, 315 So. 3d 166, 168 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (concluding that argument to trial court that statements were unreliable, without “assert[ing] that the trial court’s findings were legally insufficient,” fails to preserve a sufficiency challenge under section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes); Bass v. State, 35 So. 3d 48, 46 (Fla. Ist DCA 2010) (citing Reynolds v. State, 660 So. 2d 778, 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)) (finding section 90.403 challenge unpreserved where objection in trial court addressed bolstering, prior consistent statements, and cumulativeness but did not raise the balancing test under section 90.403). ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, Tallahassee, and Kevin P. Steiger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.