Nathaniel Brown v. State of Florida

FIFTH DISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL
S TATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2025-3682
LT Case No. 2005-CF-001831-A
_____________________________
NATHANIEL B ROWN ,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF F LORIDA,
Respondent.
_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,
A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Nathaniel Brown, Raiford, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
January 23, 2026
PER C URIAM.
This 	court 	previously 	entered 	an 	order 	denying 	what
amounted to Nathaniel Brown’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Due 	to 	Brown’s 	apparent 	abuse 	of 	the 	legal 	process 	by 	his
repetitive and frivolous pro se filings attacking his conviction and
sentence entered in 2005 in Duval County Circuit Court case

2
number 16-2005-CF-001831-A,1 we issued an order dated
December 11, 2025, directing Brown to show cause why he should
not be barred from filing in this court any appeal, petition,
pleading, or motion pertaining to his conviction and sentence
rendered in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-2005-CF-
001831-A unless reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to
practice law in the State of Florida.
Having carefully considered Brown’s response and finding
that it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed,
we conclude that Brown is abusing the judicial process and should
be barred from further pro se filings in this case. Therefore, in
order to conserve judicial resources, Nathaniel Brown is prohibited
from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning
Duval County Circuit Court Case No. 16-2005-CF-001831-A. The
Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se
filings concerning the referenced case. The Clerk will summarily
reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed
by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v.
State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is
enough.”).
PETITIONER, NATHANIEL BROWN, PROHIBITED
FROM FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS.
WALLIS, LAMBERT, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not 	final 	until 	disposition 	of 	any 	timely 	and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
1 See Brown v. Bondi, 240 So. 3d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018);
Brown v. State, 35 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).