Order

UNITED ST ATES
Filed
United States Foreign
lntelllgence Surveillance Court
NOV 0 5 201~
L..Ann Flynn Hill, Clerk of Court
FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT
WASHINGTON, D.C.
)
IN RE DIRECTIVES PURSUANT TO SECTION 	)
105B OF THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE 	)
SURVEILLANCE ACT. 	)
ORDER
Docket No. 105B(g) 07-01
The Court, having reviewed "Yahoo! Inc.'s Unclassified Motion to Lift the Stay and for a
Scheduling Order," filed in the above-captioned matter on October 24, 2014,
AND IT APPEARING THAT the Government has not taken any position on that Motion,
AND IT FURTHER APPEARING THAT the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of
Review ("FISCR") has completed its review of the related opinions and pleadings in FISCR
Docket No. 08-01,
HEREBY ORDERS as follows:
(1) In view of the completion of the above-referenced FISCR review, the Court lifts the
suspension of its review of redactions proposed by the Government, which the Court put into
effect on October 22, 2013, "in order to permit the results of the declassification process before
the [FISCR] ... to inform its examination of declassified materials on the same subject matter."
Order issued on Oct. 22, 2013. The other provisions of this Court's Order issued on October 22,
2013, in the above-captioned matter remain in effect.
Iii(2) On or before November/.£ 2014, the Government shall submit a timetable for
completing its review of, and submission of proposed redactions for, the Court's Memorandum
Opinion of April 25, 2008, and the other documents identified in Appendix A to "The United
States' Response to this Court's July 15, 2013 Order," submitted on July 29, 2013 ("Appendix
A"). That timetable shall specify dates by which the Government proposes:
(a) to advise the Court and Yahoo! Inc. whether it believes that its
redaction proposal for the Court's Memorandum Opinion of April 25,
2008, and Order Compelling Compliance With Directives of the same
date, which was filed with "The United States' Second Response to this

Court's July 15, 2013 Order," submitted on September 12, 2013, should be
modified in view of subsequent review of materials before the FIS CR or
other changes in circumstance and, if so, to submit to the Court a modified
redaction proposal for those documents.
(b) to advise the Court and Yahoo! Inc. whether it believes that its
redaction proposal for certain other documents identified in Appendix A,
which was filed with "The United States' Third Response to this Court's
July 15, 2013 Order," submitted on September 27, 2013, should be
modified in view of subsequent review of materials before the FISCR or
other changes in circumstance and, if so, to submit to the Court a modified
redaction proposal for those documents.
(c) to submit to the FISC its proposed redactions for the remaining
documents identified in Appendix A.
SO ORDERED, this ~y of November, 2014.
Judge, United 	tes F reign
Intelligence Surveillance Court
2