2020001641•EEOC Appeal 2020001641
Full text
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Romeo K., 1 Complainant, v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency. Request No. 2020001641 Appeal No. 2019001642 Agency No. 200P-0570-2017104339 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Complainant requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2019001642 (September 18, 2019). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c). In his underlying complaint, Complainant alleged the Agency subjected him to discrimination based on race (African-American), sex (male), age (over 40), and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when, on June 12, 2017, he was terminated during his probationary period. Following an investigation, Complainant requested a final decision from the Agency. 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website.
2020001641 2 The Agency issued a final decision, finding no discrimination as alleged. On appeal, the Commission affirmed the Agency’s final decision. Specifically, the Commission found Complainant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that discrimination occurred. We noted the Agency established legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for removing Complainant from his position due to his unacceptable conduct when he put his signature on a document to get a veteran into certain housing that Complainant did not have authority to do. We found other than his bare assertions, Complainant failed to produce evidence to establish that this explanation was pretext to mask discrimination and/or retaliation. Additionally, we found Complainant’s purported comparators were not similarly situated as there is no indication that they engaged in misconduct similar to that of Complainant. In his request for reconsideration, Complainant reiterates his contentions in his brief on appeal that the Agency erred in finding no discrimination as alleged. After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2019001642 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610) This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests.
2020001641 3 Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations August 27, 2020 Date
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.