Pickett v. Collier

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SHAWN PICKETT, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
) C.A. No. N24C-09-263 CLS
RANDY COLLIER, SIMPLY GREEN, )
)
Defendants. )

Submitted: February 19, 2025
Decided: March 26, 2025

ORDER

This 25th day of March 2025, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for

Reconsideration (“the Motion”);1

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the Motion is DENIED for the following

reasons:

The Motion is denied as untimely. The Motion was filed more than five (5)

days after the filing of the Court’s decision.2

1
D.I. 18.
2
“A motion for reargument shall be served and filed within 5 days after the filing of the Court's
opinion or decision.” Super. Ct. Civ. R. 59(e).

1
Further, Plaintiff does not identify any controlling precedent or legal principle

that this Court overlooked, nor does he demonstrate the Court misapprehended the

law or facts in a way that would affect the outcome of its decision.3

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Calvin Scott
Calvin L. Scott, Jr.
Judge

3
Cummings v. Jimmy’s Grille, Inc., 2000 WL 1211167, at *2 (Del. Super. Aug. 9, 2000).

2