State v. Holloway

CourtListener 7905861ConnappctOct 29, 1991

Full text

Per Curiam.
The state concedes that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to order the defendant’s property forfeited because of the state’s failure to initiate proper proceedings under the drug forfeiture statute. General Statutes § 54-36a et seq.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded with direction to grant the defendant’s motion for the return of the seized property.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.