CourtListener 7888701•Carnahan v. Connolly
Full text
Per Curiam.
The questions involved in this case are the same as those determined in No. 1933, Charles T. Carnahan, plaintiff in error, v. P. K. Connolly, defendant in error, and for reasons given in that case the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.