The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-5276•September Term, 2017 1:17-cv-02122-TSC Filed On: December 20, 2017 Rochelle Garza,… v. Eric D. Hargan, Acting Secretary, Health and Human Services
17-5276Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia CircuitDec 20, 2017
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 17-5276 September Term, 2017
1:17-cv-02122-TSC
Filed On: December 20, 2017
Rochelle Garza, as guardian ad litem to
unaccompanied minor J.D., on behalf of
herself and others similarly situated, et al.,
Appellees
v.
Eric D. Hargan, Acting Secretary, Health and
Human Services, et al.,
Appellants
------------------------------
Consolidated with 17-5277
BEFORE: Rogers, Tatel, and Millett, Circuit Judges
O R D E R
Upon consideration of the unopposed motions for voluntary dismissal filed by the
government and the individual Appellants, and the Appellees’ sealed motion for leave to
file document under seal and for leave to file redacted version on the public record, it is
ORDERED that the government’s motion for voluntary dismissal be granted. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the individual Appellants’ motion for voluntary
dismissal be granted. It is
FURTHER ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that the court will retain
jurisdiction over the Appellees’ sealed motion for leave to file document under seal and
for leave to file redacted version on the public record, see D.C. Cir. Rule 47.1(f); Fed. R.
App. P. 10(e)(2)(C), and that disposition of that motion be held in abeyance pending the
district court’s disposition of the motion to unseal the same material pending before it,
-- 1 of 2 --
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 17-5276 September Term, 2017
see D.C. Cir. Rule 47.1(c). The parties are directed to file motions to govern further
proceedings within five days of the district court’s disposition of the pending motion.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
is directed to issue the mandate forthwith to the district court.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY: /s/
Ken Meadows
Deputy Clerk
Page 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.